Konstantin, good day!
25.04.2024 0:09, Konstantin Belousov пишет:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:12:39PM +0500, BSD USER wrote:
linking kernel
ld: error: undefined symbol: ktrcapfail
referenced by vfs_lookup.c
vfs_lookup.o:(namei)
referenced by vfs_lookup.c
Sorry for HTML-trash from previous mail :)
Hi, FreeBSD Community!
I have a teach with FreeBSD and use -CURRENT on my test machine.
And some days ago after
- git pull
- make buildworld
- make buildkernel
There is /etc/src.conf and BSDSERV below, what can cause that error?
Thanks for help!
My /usr
Hi, FreeBSD Community! I have a teach with FreeBSD and use -CURRENT on my test machine.And some days ago after- git pull- make buildworld- make buildkernel There is /etc/src.conf and BSDSERV below, what can cause that error?Thanks for help! kernel building failed with such messages:
Question for GPGPU users:
How important are denormalized floats to GPGPU? (when the number is
so small that it can't be normalized with the smallest possible exponent)
The graphics people don't care, just round it. Do the GPGPU people care?
(This is for the Open Graphics Project, which is design
> I would be happy if such a page would see an update in shorter terms
> like 11 years ...
Fixing some ancient PRs would be nice also. (fixed, not just closed)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 02/09/10 22:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier t
zilla/content/events'
gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/sandbox/firebird/work/mozilla/content'
gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/sandbox/firebird/work/mozilla'
gmake: *** [default] Error 2
*** Error code 2
Thanks in advance
--
Kro
:03 -0400 (EDT), "Andre Guibert de Bruet"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, KroNiC~BSD wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:29:05 -0600, "KroNiC~BSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
> > > I am trying to compile firebird
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:29:05 -0600, "KroNiC~BSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I am trying to compile firebird on freebsd 5-current. Something appears
> to be wrong with the compiler on the 5.x series as i am getting the
> following errors:
>
> c++ -o TestCOMPtr.o -c
Hey all,
I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 to get myself familiar with the
upcoming ACLs present in -CURRENT before the release itself. I've setup a
test machine with one 45gb ide drive with one slice and two partitions (/
and swap) and installed FreeBSD on it.
dumpfs / shows that root is U
Great thanks!
Chris
On 26 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My problem is that the passwd command isn't doing anything, at all.
>
> Already fixed, cvsup and rebuild libpam.
>
> > Also, if a user does have a password,
I realize this probably isn't a -current issue, but since I don't have any
experience with PAM I don't know for sure if it's just me or not.
My problem is that the passwd command isn't doing anything, at all. I
have the stock pam setup (/etc/pam.d, /etc/pam.conf deleted after running
mergemast
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Paul van der Zwan wrote:
> I have looked at a trace I made using snoop and it shows an NFS_ACL call which
> is not supported by FreeBSD. It should have sent a reply that it does not
> know the NFS_ACL protocol but apparently it does not.
> The only return traffic I see is an
There was some talk about patches getting committed to fix multiple
problems with Solaris 8 NFS clients. Did those ever get committed?
As of 10/23, I'm still seeing problems. If they have been committed, I'll
pull out ethereal and start sniffing packets. However, if something is
about to get c
The problem seems to be in the /usr/src/share/examples/Makefile
copies:: is an idiom used in only one other place in the BSD tree (in
sendmail -- the /usr/src/share/sendmail/Makefile). Burying copies::
inside a .for loop seems to hide the indentifier from make. It probably
shouldn't
Does anyone know if these changes have been made?
Thank you!
Vladimir
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 18:50:34 2000
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: rpc.lockd and XDR 64bit
Dear BSD-users,
I apologize for a potentially off-topic question, but I could
not find a more appropriate mailing list. We are thinking
of setting up and maintaining a cvsup mirror of FreeBSD
sources and making it available for everyone.I would
appreciate if someone could direct me to
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>I tend not to like the higher optimization levels because they cause
>the compiler to attempt to turn static functions into inlines and,
>in my opinion, it doesn't do a very good job of selecting which functions
>to convert. The result
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Works rather nicely here with
> >
> > -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimizations
> > -ffast-math
>
> -O6 is too much; -O3 is the highest level tested for by egcs.
But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm u
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the
> kernel?
Works rather nicely here with
-O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimizations
-ffast-math
LLaP
bero
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
20 matches
Mail list logo
