On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:09:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Steve Sizemore wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP
> > > has been "I have an old Linux
e you already forgotten the locking problem that you were
helping me with last week? The only solution was to use UDP.
Steve
--
Steve Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, (510) 642-8570
Unix System Manager
Dept. of Mathematics and College of Letters and Science
U
efore concluding that it was hung.
I'll report back on the status of xinet tomorrow, but thanks to all of
you for your help and suggestions. If there's any more information
I can provide, or testing that I can do, to help fix the
NFS/tcp/Solaris problem, let me know.
Thanks.
Steve
--
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 05:25:36PM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Steve Sizemore wrote:
>
> > root 399 0.0 0.1 263496 1000 ?? Is9:11AM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/rpc.sta
> > root 402 0.0 0.1 1512 1156 ?? Ss9:11AM 0:00.00
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:49:25PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Steve Sizemore wrote:
> > I don't see now it could be "inter-program", since I've gone to great
> > lengths to simplify it to a single program failing on a brand new file.
>
> Is the file
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:36:58PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Steve Sizemore wrote:
> > useful. As it is, it's still interesting. I have no way of judging the
> > quality of the code in question, other than the empirical result that
> > it works in most cases.
>
&g
Works
FreeBSD Solaris Works
FreeBSD FreeBSD Works
Solaris FreeBSD Problems
Actually, when I say "works", all I know is that it doesn't hang.
Whether or not the lock is actually effective, I haven't
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:21:19PM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Steve Sizemore wrote:
>
> The dump doesn't seem to be attached. However, I note that the request
It appears that there are problems sending the raw dump. I've tried
twice - onc
on Freebsd, lockd and statd
still running on Solaris.
I hope the tcpdump gives you a clue what might be going wrong...
Thanks.
Steve
--
Steve Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, (510) 642-8570
Unix System Manager
Dept. of Mathematics and College of Letters and Science
University of Calif
blame :)
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 06:14:59PM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Steve Sizemore wrote:
>
> > Running RELENG_5_0 as nfs server with a Solaris 2.5 client.
> > rpc.statd and rpc.lockd both running on FreeBSD, lockd and
> > sta
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:58:56AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Mar 13), Steve Sizemore said:
> > Running RELENG_5_0 as nfs server with a Solaris 2.5 client. rpc.statd
> > and rpc.lockd both running on FreeBSD, lockd and statd both running
> > on Solaris.
king for a while,
but it stopped, for reasons unkown.
I'd appreciate any information, or ideas of other things
to try.
Thanks.
Steve
--
Steve Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, (510) 642-8570
Unix System Manager
Dept. of Mathematics and College of Letters and Science
University of Cal
12 matches
Mail list logo
