Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-26 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-21 at 20:40, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote: > On 21.07.2010 18:33, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > > I -might- have solved my problem. It has now ran for 24h without timeouts, > > and with a bit of load on it. I think I might have ran into the seagate + > >

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-21 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
D17 to firmware SD1B (old SD17) and SD1A (old SD15), and that looks like it has done the trick. I'll report back in a week or so if the problem has not reappeared. -- Ståle Kristoffersen ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fr

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-20 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
is to get rid of the timeouts, but a panic on one can't be right. How can I debug this further? I can get timeout fairly consistent by putting a bit of load on the drives. If it would help I can also provide remote access. I'm trying to update the firmware on some of the drives now to see

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-19 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
nly differed from the > 8-STABLE one in a cosmetic change at that time. I have another data-point, I cvsup'ed to the latest current again, and rebuilt without INVARIANT and WITNESS, and now it seems to survive the timeouts. -- Ståle Kristoffersen ___

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-18 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-16 at 12:31, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > On 2010-07-15 at 19:52, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > > On 2010-07-15 at 18:00, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: > > > > Upgraded to from stable to curr

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-16 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-15 at 19:52, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > On 2010-07-15 at 18:00, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote: > > > Upgraded to from stable to current yesterday and very quickly received a > > > panic. It did

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-15 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
hat revision I was using, is there an easy way to figure that out? I ran cvsupdate around 13:00 CEST yesterday. > Does using current as of r209598 make a difference? Downgrading now... -- Ståle Kristoffersen staal...@ifi.uio.no ___ freebsd-curr

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-15 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-15 at 14:34, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > Upgraded to from stable to current yesterday and very quickly received a > panic. It did however not dump it's core, so I was unable to debug it. > Today it did panic again, and I took a picture: (Sorry about the bad > q

current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-15 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
http://folk.uio.no/stalk/mpt/IMG_1404.JPG Both times I hade the mpt0: request timed out just before the panic. I'm not sure why it's not dumping it's core (It was working under stable, and I have dumpdev="AUTO" and dumpdir="/var/crash&q