On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > >This breaks several other ports (like BitchX).
> >
> > I think this breaks all IRC's which are cloned from the same origin :-)
>
> I'm still looking for the downside to this. ;-)
>
Well *some* of us still use ircII, however I've successfully compi
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> I must admit that I have been less then tactful about this thread. I
> apologize for this. This is my last response to this because once again
> this has gone on far too long.
>
> As far as this response goes. I sense "selective reading." I never sa
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Siobhan Patricia Lynch wrote:
uhoh, on a related note, I missed something, the sysctl's have been taken
out? I definitely missed something. when did this happen?
-Trish
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I would assume that code hasn;t cha
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Julian Elischer wrote:
I would assume that code hasn;t changed, it works with ipfw, man bridge:
options BRIDGE
in the kernel config file, and is controlled by two sysctl variables:
net.link.ether.bridge
Set to 1 to enable bridging, set to 0 to
more info,
the N440BX has a symbios scsi card on board and an fxp card onboard.
I'm using relatively old scsi drives (4500 RPM seagates and HP drives)
I have softupdates on, and I'm now using COMPAT_OLDPCI for now, although I
only turned it back on after seeing that was the only real change I made
John,
I get these on an SMP kernel, which locks up the box, I can't even
figure out where exactly its happening. Maybe I'm just missing something
in my kernel config file? I assumed (from UPDATING) that no real change
was
needed to the SMP options?
The hardware is an Intel N440BX motherbo
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Most definitely an SMPng issue. If you take a SMP machine and compile a UP
> and an SMP kernel on it, the SMP kernel will boot fine, whereas the UP kernel
> will generate these warnings.
>
John,
not quite, I have an SMP box that I got these
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Siobhan Patricia Lynch writes:
> >this is cute:
> >notice the dates, they predate the epoch.
>
> Because of your timezone.
>
nod, figured that out already, however, is the e
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:28:00AM -0400, Siobhan Patricia Lynch wrote:
>^
> > this is cute:
> > notice the dates, they predate the epoch.
>
> They don't predate the epoch. The
this is cute:
notice the dates, they predate the epoch.
weird huh? anyone else see this or am I just off my rocker?
-Trish
total 0
crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 117, 0 Dec 31 1969 acd0a
crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 117, 2 Dec 31 1969 acd0c
crw-r- 1 root operator 15, 0x0001000
weird, works fine for me here
-trish
__
Trish Lynch
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rush Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Chris Costello wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 30, 200
11 matches
Mail list logo
