Fix for WINE on -CURRENT

2003-11-03 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
hanks, Scot W. Hetzel Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/wine/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.152 diff -u -r1.152 Makefile --- Makefile27 Oct 2003 06:16:28 - 1.152 +++ Makefile4 Nov 2003 04:20:37

Re: bug in NSS ?

2003-10-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Alex Deiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> I have a problem with nss_ldap on FreeBSD. > > >> After tranfer users from /etc/passwd to ldap directories my users > cannot > > >>

Re: bug in NSS ?

2003-10-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Alex Deiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I have a problem with nss_ldap on FreeBSD. > >> After tranfer users from /etc/passwd to ldap directories my users cannot > >> send a mail via /usr/bin/mail | /usr/sbin/sendmail program: > > >What are the contents of the /usr/local/lib/sasl*/Sendmail.con

Re: bug in NSS ?

2003-10-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Дейтер Александр Валерьевич" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a problem with nss_ldap on FreeBSD. > After tranfer users from /etc/passwd to ldap directories my users cannot > send a mail via /usr/bin/mail | /usr/sbin/sendmail program: > : > Any ideas ? > What are the contents of the /usr/local/

Re: Getting -pthread support back into local source tree

2003-09-22 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Harald Schmalzbauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > From: "Dan Naumov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking > >>_LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to &q

Re: Getting -pthread support back into local source tree

2003-09-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Dan Naumov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking > > _LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to "get it back" into a local source > > tre

Re: Getting -pthread support back into local source tree

2003-09-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Dan Naumov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking > _LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to "get it back" into a local source > tree ? If so, how ? Thanks in advance. > All you need to do is add: CONFIGURE_ENV+=PTHREAD_LIBS=${PTHREAD_LIB

Re: -pthread deprecated, but when?

2003-09-09 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Doug Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Matthias Andree wrote: > > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > @ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/configure ${WRKSRC}/configure.Patched > > > @ ${SED} -e 's#-lpthread#${PTHREAD_LIBS}#g' \ > > > > How about: ${SED} -Ee 's#-l?

Re: is there a "knob" for devfs rules?

2003-09-01 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "John Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi all, in debugging /dev/usb* and /dev/ugen* permissions problems so that I > could access my digital camera as a mere-mortal user, I came across this > posting to -questions: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1203173+1206388+/usr/local/www

Re: Regarding recent spam on the list

2003-08-21 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote: > > Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc. > > > > I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them > > FreeBSD related) so I was wonder

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-19 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Shin-ichi Yoshimoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree, > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:28:53 +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > > Thanks Gordon. I can save a space :-) > > I found another problem in src/Makefile.inc > > [snip] > .if ${TARGET_ARCH} =

Re: help! 5.1 doesn't want to start my nic :)

2003-08-14 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Charlie Schluting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I ran /etc/rc.d/netif manually, and it said it couldn't find > /etc/network.subr, so I copied that over manually, rebooted, and the > interfaces still didn't start. But, if I run /etc/rc.d/netif manually, > it starts just fine now! Yes, the file has e

Re: help! 5.1 doesn't do the rc thing?

2003-08-14 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Charlie Schluting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > OMG. > I did it (the 5.1 update), and it went flawlessly until the reboot. > I read /usr/src/UPDATING! It said that the old rc system was going away, > but it would keep all your old files. > > So anyways, does anyone have a link to info about how th

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs andprocfsautomatically

2003-08-14 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
I just noticed a problem with periodic scripts inside a jail. I'm getting: Local system status: tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported Mail in local queue: tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported Mail in submit queue: tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported in the periodic daily, weekly

Re: JAIL and SSH out?

2003-08-11 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is there a way to ssh out from a jail? > > jail$ ssh otherhost > Permission denied, please try again. > Permission denied, please try again. > Permission denied (publickey,password). > jail$ ssh -V > OpenSSH_3.6.1p1 FreeBSD-20030423, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090

Re: Anyone use WINE at all anywhere?

2003-08-02 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is the re ANYONE that uses wine on -current...? > > for that matter, a -current user that uses wine on 4.x? > I set up wine on current to run D2GS (Diablo II Game Server) using XVFB. I haven't used wine for any other purposes than this. Scot

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs andprocfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
Below is my current patch to devfs and jail to support the mounting of devfs and procfs in jails. This patch also allows a jail to specify what devfs rule to apply to the jail. As well as defining a default jail devfs rule in /etc/rc.d/devfs. Scot Index: etc/defaults/rc.conf ===

Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs andprocfsautomatically

2003-07-29 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Mike Makonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > > >jail, and apply them to the devfs m

Re: /etc/rc: WARNING: domainname(1) is not set.

2003-07-08 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Tom Parquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > I have been getting the message "/etc/rc: WARNING: domainname(1) is not > set" every time I boot one of my machines. > It is a 5.1-CURRENT system but I have not updated since June 15. > Do you have "hostname" set in /etc/rc.conf? Scot ___

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

2003-07-05 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Any ideas? > > According to the inetd man page: TCP Wrappers When given the -w option, inetd will wrap all services specified as ``stream nowait'' or ``dgram'' except for ``internal'' services. If the -W option is given, such ``internal'

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

2003-07-04 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You only enabled 1/3 of the source to use PROCESS_OPTIONS, you also need to > add the option to libwrap (lib/libwrap) and tcpdchk (src/usr.sbin/tcpdchk). > Small correction, the lib/libwrap/Makefile is setting PROCESS_OPTIONS

Re: src/libexec/tcpd doesn't work correctly with -DPROCESS_OPTIONS

2003-07-04 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In -CURRENT, /usr/src/libexec/tcpd, the Makefile doesn't have > -DPROCESS_OPTIONS needed which in hosts_access(5) manpage, allows things > such as banners for the tcp_wrappers to be working. > > So in the /usr/src/libexec/tcpd/Makefile, I added > -DPROCESS

Re: p5-GD-1.41 wont build

2003-07-01 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Christophe Zwecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > any clue whats going wrong here ? > One of the port-commiters updated the gd 1.x port to gd 2.0.15. This has been backed out as of 8 hours ago. Uninstall gd-2.0.15 and re-cvsup your ports collection. Scot ___

BDECFLAGS being added to CFLAGS and CWARNFLAGS ( was Re: [solved]buildworld error)

2003-06-11 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Munehiro Matsuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was having the same compile error, until I commeted out the > BDECFLAGS definition from /etc/make.conf. > > Looking into the problematic Makefiles, I've found that following > Makefiles do references BDECFLAGS, which matches errors I was getting: > >

Re: /etc/hosts completely ignored

2003-05-29 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Roberto Nunnari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -bash-2.05b# cat /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost.noonlights.net localhost > 192.168.1.5 jupiter.noonlights.net jupiter > 192.168.1.5 jupiter.noonlights.net. > 193.5.56.6 www.freebsd.org myfreebsd > > n

Adduser difference between 5.0 and earlier versions

2003-01-21 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
I noticed that adduser in 5.0, only allows you to add one user in interactive mode. The previous version of adduser would ask you if you wanted to add another user. Attached is a patch which puts this feature back into adduser. Scot Index: adduser.sh

Kernel Panic in runq_check

2002-12-17 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
I have a CURRENT system that is panicing on me every couple of days. I have enabled crash dumps in the rc.conf file, but when the system is rebooted, savecore doesn't find any core files on the swap partition. The system has 128M RAM installed, and the swap partion is ~512M. I am using a GENERIC

Re: Upgrade of port audio/id3lib - stdc++ wchar support missing

2002-12-05 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:54:11AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > >>You could try the patch I've attached: > >> > >>cd /usr/src > >>zcat c++-wchar.diff.gz | patch > >>c

RC_NG for local rc scripts

2002-10-04 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
I was looking at how the RC_NG base scripts work, and decide to try changing a few ports rc scripts to RC_NG. The process was simple enough to convert the security/cyrus_sasl{,2} (pwcheck.sh, saslauthd{1,}.sh), mail/cyrus_imapd{,2} (imapd.sh), net/openldap{,2} (slapd.sh) and databases/mysql323-{

Re: Junk in new gcc include path

2002-05-27 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Garrett Wollman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > < said: > > > So why does adding "-I/usr/include" to CPPFLAGS cause the compiler to ignore > > the headers in /usr/include? > > It doesn't -- it just causes the compiler to emit a warning message > which confuses AC_CHECK_HEADER in some versions of aut

Re: Junk in new gcc include path

2002-05-25 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does anybody else saw this too? > I just run 'cc -v hello.c' (printing Hello, world) and see: > ... > GNU C version 3.1 [FreeBSD] 20020509 (prerelease) > (i386-undermydesk-freebsd) > compiled by GNU C version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]. > igno

Re: Another possible solution for non-sendmail users

2002-03-28 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Coleman Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Another thing to look at is the /usr/sbin/sendmail -> mailwrapper link that is > produced from installworld. In current it seems to have been linking that, even Stable creates the same links to mailwrapper. > when NO_SENDMAIL=yes in make.conf. Qmail et

Re: Approach to integrate a driver into the kernel [winmodem]

2001-10-11 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Benjamin Close wrote: > > I've now been using the FreeBSD winmodem driver (Available at: > >http://www.geocities.com/wtnbkysh/) under -current for a few weeks now > >and haven't noticed a single glitch. Whilst I know this is a

Re: build problem ?

2001-07-24 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Olivier Cortes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i cvsuped 20 minutes ago. > > when i try to build (-j 6), it says: > > > i couln't find the exact error point... i have a full make.out (make > -j 6 buildworld) at http://www.deep-ocean.net/~olive/files/make.out if > you want to look at it. > > i know

Re: making sendmail with milter and sasl

2000-12-23 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
he milter daemons. This script needs to be placed in PREFIX/etc/rc.milter (see src/lib/libmilter/sample.sh). Scot W. Hetzel To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: rpc.lockd

2000-09-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Roman Shterenzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yeah probably should...perhaps suggest it to -docs. Someone (from > > something.edu, perhaps rpi.edu) posted a URL to one of the lists of a > > working but untested rpc.lockd. You might like to try it..

Re: Installkernel

2000-08-27 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "James Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The method of building and installing a kernel to me seems a bit off.. Both > the buildworld and installworld targets default to GENERIC, yet GENERIC is a > file checked into the -CURRENT CVS repository.. Any changes to this file > will get blown away if

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-12 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Gregory Neil Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > hetzels> Sendmail 8.11 has the ablity to due secure authentication with > hetzels> mail clients when compiled with Cyrus-SASL. > > hetzels> Will the Cyrus-SASL library be imported to provide this > hetzels> capability? Or at least a make.conf var

Re: FrontPage Extensions

2000-06-06 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Phil Regnauld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Terry Lambert writes: > > For what it's worth, the FP security issues are very well documented > > by ReadyToRun Software's site (these are the folks who do the UNIX > > ports for Microsoft). > > > > They also keep both BSDI 2.1 and 3.0 binaries availabl

Re: New 64 bit Compiler from SGI

2000-05-18 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Amancio Hasty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For those interested , SGI has released their 64 bit > compiler for Intel's Itanium. > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/Pro64/ > That great, now when does FreeBSD64 come out ;-) Is FreeBSD 64-bit clean as referred to in the below question from the SGI FAQ

Re: FBSD4.0-RC3 install

2000-03-09 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This should work now - it just needed some symlinks to be created. > The link to the packages directory is wrong. It is pointing one to many directories back. packages -> ../../../../ports/i386/packages-4-current it should be: packages -> ../..

Re: make.conf on CURRENT question

1999-07-28 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > compat22=yes in /etc/make.conf accomplishes a.out support which we need > for netscape support. Correct? > You will also need a.out libraries from XFree86 in order to get Netscape working. > What does compat3x do however? Provide ELF compatibilit

Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
What does everyone think about using this at the end of /etc/defaults/rc.conf? for i in ${rc_conf_files}; do if [ $0 != $i ]; then if [ -f $i ]; then . $i fi else echo "Error: $0 isn't allowed to re-load $i." echo "Error: Please do not cop

Re: how to set the ne2000 pci network card in the config file

1999-02-25 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: Chan Yiu Wah > I recently found that my pci network card didn't work for me any more. It > was recognized by the system but I could config it. This didn't happen before > and I didn't why. I had tried to config it as ed1 in my config file. > Then it was probed by the system as ed2 ..

Re: "make upgrade NOCONFIRM=YES" (Was: Re: Hate to ask, but...aout ->elf ... )

1999-01-26 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: The Hermit Hacker > > make upgrade NOCONFIRM=YES > Your source tree must not be fully populated; unable to find upgrade > script > in /usr/src/release/scripts/doupgrade.sh. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > Just connected to freefall and did a 'cvs checkout' of r