Re: CDC-WDM driver (4G modems)

2014-09-12 Thread PseudoCylon
> Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:23:07 +0200 > From: Nick Hibma > To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG > Cc: Hans Petter Selasky > Subject: CDC-WDM driver (4G modems) > Message-ID: <2d4cf978-b2c2-4253-93c7-595dabac0...@van-laarhoven.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > F

Re: patches for if_iwi and wlan for WEP mode

2012-03-08 Thread PseudoCylon
> -- > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:45:11 -0800 > From: Adrian Chadd > Subject: Re: patches for if_iwi and wlan for WEP mode > To: Mitsuru IWASAKI > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org, >        bschm...@freebsd.org > Message-ID: >

Re: [CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem

2011-07-08 Thread PseudoCylon
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 08 July 2011 03:25:39 PseudoCylon wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: >> > On Thursday 07 July 2011 14:43:22 PseudoCylon wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 201

Re: [CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem

2011-07-07 Thread PseudoCylon
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Thursday 07 July 2011 14:43:22 PseudoCylon wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'm going to review and import your driver.

Re: [CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem

2011-07-07 Thread PseudoCylon
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm going to review and import your driver. >> >> --HPS > > Hi, > > The intial patch had some bad code and didn't compile on 9-current. I've tried > to clean it up. Please test and report back if I didn't break anything. >

Re: [CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem

2011-06-28 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message - > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; PseudoCylon > Cc: "freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org" > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:50:57 AM > Subject: Re: [CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem > > On Tuesday 28 June

[CFT] Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem

2011-06-27 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello Here is a driver for Sierra Wireless HSPA+ USB modem. Please test it. My subscription will expire on June 29, 2011. (Yes, it sounds silly.) So, try it before too late. source tree https://gitorious.org/usie/usie/trees/master tarball https://gitorious.org/usie/usie/archive-tarball/master

Re: [CFT]RT28xx/RT30xx wireless was [CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment

2011-03-31 Thread PseudoCylon
> > rt28600: mem 0xf7f0-0xf7f0 irq 17 at > > device 0.0 on pci3 > > rt28600: invalid EEPROM LNA gain #2: 0x00 > > rt28600: invalid EEPROM LNA gain #3: 0x00 > > rt28600: invalid EEPROM powersave level > > rt28600: MAC/BBP RT2860 (rev 0x28720200), RF RT3022 2.4G 2T2R > Wow, your device h

Re: [CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment

2011-03-21 Thread PseudoCylon
> >> > >> I urge you to have a closer look at ral(4) and it's way of handling > >> RT2500 and RT2600 specific differences. In it's simplest form you can > >> copy the OpenBSD code 1:1 without any functional changes, heck, it's > >> the source of this driver anyway. > >> > >> -- > >> Bernhard

Re: svn commit: r203134 - in head: share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/contrib/dev/run sys/dev/usb sys/dev/usb/wlan sys/modules sys/modules/runfw sys/modules/usb sys/modules/usb/run

2010-09-28 Thread PseudoCylon
> > > > hostname.if(5) is something that only exists in OpenBSD. > > I think the following would be better: > > For more information on configuring this device, see > > .Xr ifconfig 8 . > > > > Hi, > > This is still relevant. hostname.if(5) is in OBSD. > Will someone fix this? > > -- > wbr,

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-22 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Rui Paulo > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: Bernhard Schmidt ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; >Adrian Chadd > Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 4:48:14 PM > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > On 22 Sep 2010, at

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-22 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Bernhard Schmidt > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: PseudoCylon ; Adrian Chadd > Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:09:36 AM > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 06:04:49 PseudoCylon wrote

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-21 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Adrian Chadd > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 7:04:37 AM > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > > On 21 September 2010 11:58, PseudoCylon wrote: > > > Just in case

Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring

2010-09-20 Thread PseudoCylon
> Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:04:47 +0800 > From: Adrian Chadd > Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring > To: Brandon Weisz > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 19 September 2010 01:01, Adrian Chadd wrote:

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-22 Thread PseudoCylon
: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: PseudoCylon ; Sam Leffler ; >freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:00:26 AM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers > > Hi, > > Please confirm that

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-21 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sam Leffler ; >freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:46:34 AM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers > > On Tuesd

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-20 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: PseudoCylon ; Sam Leffler ; >freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 1:17:04 PM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers > > Hi AK,

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-18 Thread PseudoCylon
[NB] Obviously, I didn't click "reply ALL" last time, so here are missing part > > > > -if(vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP){ > > > > > > > > -RUN_LOCK(sc); > > > > +if (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP) > > > > > > > > sc->cmdq_key_set = RUN_CMDQ_GO; > > > > > > > > -RUN_UNLOCK(sc)

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-07-14 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, July 13, 2010 11:04:59 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > PseudoCylon wrote: > > - Original M

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-14 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: Andrew Thompson ; Sam Leffler ; >PseudoCylon ; freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 2:01:11 PM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device driv

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-07-12 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: PseudoCylon > To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Cc: Ganbold ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 12:26:58 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > >>>>>> From: Ganbold > >

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-12 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: Andrew Thompson ; Sam Leffler ; >PseudoCylon ; freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 2:01:11 PM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device driv

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-07-07 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: PseudoCylon ; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >; Ganbold > Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 12:54:31 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > Hello PseudoCylon is he

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-07-05 Thread PseudoCylon
>>>>>> From: Ganbold >>>>>> To: PseudoCylon >>>>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >>>>>> Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:33:47 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralin

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-07-05 Thread PseudoCylon
>>>> From: Ganbold >>>> To: PseudoCylon >>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >>>> Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:33:47 AM >>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless >>>> >>

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-17 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message >> From: Ganbold >> To: PseudoCylon >> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >> Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:33:47 AM >> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless >> >> AK-san, > >Pse

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-16 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Tue, June 15, 2010 8:02:02 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > AK-san, >PseudoCylon wrote: >&

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-15 Thread PseudoCylon
>>> From: Ganbold >>> To: PseudoCylon >>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >>> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM >>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless >>> >>> It seems like i

Re: run(4) patch

2010-06-12 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Sat, June 12, 2010 12:30:18 AM > Subject: Re: run(4) patch > >> On Friday 11 June 2010 08:27:53 PseudoCylon wrote: >> Hel

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-10 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > It seems like it is running without any problem

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-09 Thread PseudoCylon
> Hello, > > Sorry for taking long. > > But, please try following update (if_run.c and if_runvar.h) > http://gitorious.org/run/run/blobs/raw/a74fa9ba5a16f1d1f058efa724261351e267a474/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c > http://gitorious.org/run/run/blobs/raw/a74fa9ba5a16f1d1f058efa724261351e267a474/dev/usb/wlan/

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-09 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 9:09:22 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Any update on driver side? > Please

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-27 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 10:10:46 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > It looks like either bridge or wlan/run drive

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-05 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: Ganbold ; PseudoCylon ; > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 2:00:02 PM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Hi, > > Ca

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-03 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 8:54:11 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Thanks a lot, works no problem so far here wi

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-05-01 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu > Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:44:20 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Thank you very much. > However it still pa

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-04-24 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, Thank you for all the info. This one shall work. http://projects.nasreddine.com/projects/run/repository/revisions/mips_fix/show/dev/usb/wlan Please update if_run.c and if_runvar.h (2 files). Just in case, after kldload, please issue # sysctl hw.usb.run.debug=1 Now it prints out very little

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-04-23 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, Can you try this? (all 3 files has been updated) http://projects.nasreddine.com/projects/run/repository/revisions/mips_fix/show/dev/usb/wlan This is for rev 207077 or newer. If you are using older rev, please let me know with rev #, I'll change the code accordingly. If it isn't too much

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-04-08 Thread PseudoCylon
AK - Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, April 6, 2010 7:29:16 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > PseudoCylon wrote: > - Original Message > > &

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-04-01 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 8:08:29 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Does stock run(4) support hostap mode yet? No. There were some bugs

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-30 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Ganbold > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 7:01:32 AM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > JFYI, I have just tested if_run and works fine on HEAD (i386). >

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-27 Thread PseudoCylon
>> Same. >> >> rspro# ifconfig wlan0 up >> >> rspro# Trap cause = 5 (address error (store) - kernel > mode) >> [ thread pid 0 tid 100047 ] >> Stopped at > ieee80211_radiotap_vdetach+0x70: > sh v1,0(a0) >> db> bt >> Tracing pid 0 > tid 100047 td 0xc0f1f260 >> db_trace_t

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-18 Thread PseudoCylon
Can you show me output of followings? (I have only intel chips.) #kldstat | grep if_run (after loading the driver. no need to run it) #objdump -h /boot/kernel/if_run.ko | grep text #objdump --source /boot/kernel/if_run.ko | grep \>: AK > Same. > rspro# ifconfig wlan0 up > > rspro# Trap ca

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-16 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, again. Can you try this patch? Patch is for if_runvar.h --begin patch-- *** old_if_runvar.h2010-03-16 19:14:25.0 -0600 --- new_if_runvar.h2010-03-16 19:15:51.0 -0600 *** *** 184,186 uint8_tval; ! }bbp[8], rf[10];

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-16 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, Can you check version of firmware for me? At the end of ralink's license (before the actual code) in rt2870.fw.uu, if it says RT2870 v. 0.11 RT3071 v. 0.11 it's the latest. If there is no version info, it is old version. Your chipset, rt3070 + rf3020 uses mcu command to select the antenn

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-12 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Rui Paulo > To: Weongyo Jeong > Cc: PseudoCylon ; Alexander Egorenkov > ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 7:42:46 PM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > On 13 Mar 2010, at 09

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-04 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Rui Paulo > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 5:02:50 PM > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless > > Hi, > > > This code is fine from a quick review. It just

CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-04 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works fine in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80 hours and counting. I even filed tax though it. The device supports up to 253 stations. I only tested with 2 station. If you have resources, please hit it with bunch of STAs. As usual co

quick Call for Test run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-02-14 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, There are revisions on OpenBSD run(4), so I applied the applicable changes to ours. Because lots of changes has been made (more than 20 revisions in 24 hour period), I thought I should do a quick test. Please give it a try. The driver is posted at http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?