Hi all,
> Am 22.05.2025 um 23:57 schrieb Marek Zarychta :
> I think enough noise has been made. Regardless of its cause and intentions,
> this kind of noise isn't good for the FreeBSD community.
I meant that strictly in the sense of raising awareness
about the issue and potential unexpected brea
Hi all,
> Am 22.05.2025 um 22:15 schrieb void :
> I think, from what other list members have written also, that many did as I
> did:- looked at the virtualization part of the handbook, found all what
> was required there to get started, and thats it. They would probably not
> (as I didn't) see th
Hi all,
> Am 22.05.2025 um 02:14 schrieb void :
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:21:29PM +0100, Lexi Winter wrote:
>
>> i am not sure about this. i admit i have not done a survey :-) however,
>> i believe most people using jails or bhyve are not affected. the
>> Handbook is clear about the corre
Hi all,
> Am 20.05.2025 um 11:24 schrieb A FreeBSD User :
> I need a IPv6 prefix on bridge0. With the "wrong/faulty" concept I simply
> used
>
> rtsold_flags="-iu igb0"
>
> within /etc/rc.conf. Changing this line to
> rtsold_flags="-iu bridge0" while bridge0 is up and running doesn't work,
>
Sorry, missed a detail:
> Am 20.05.2025 um 11:29 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen :
>
> Hi all,
>
>> Am 20.05.2025 um 11:24 schrieb A FreeBSD User :
>> I need a IPv6 prefix on bridge0. With the "wrong/faulty" concept I simply
>> used
>>
>>
Hi all,
> Am 19.05.2025 um 10:53 schrieb Lexi Winter :
>
> the basic problem here is that putting IP addresses on a bridge member
> is a layering violation and it's just not reasonable (or even possible)
> to support this in a sensible way in bridge. this is why most dedicated
> network devices
Hi all,
> Am 30.01.2025 um 12:35 schrieb A FreeBSD User :
> Well, in this case I do not use dedicated ZIL drives. I also made several
> experiences with
> "single" ZIL drive setups, but a dedicated ZIL is mostly useful in cases were
> you have
> graveyard full of inertia-suffering, mass-spinning
Hi all,
> Am 27.01.2025 um 18:38 schrieb Milan Obuch :
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:10:43 -0500
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
>> I recently bought one of those mini-pc firewall devices (Topton 12th
>> gen N100 with 4x I226-V, 2x X520) and couldn't get it to install pkg
>> or buildkernel without gettin
Hi all,
> Am 13.02.2024 um 20:56 schrieb Pete Wright :
> 1. M.2 nvme really does need proper cooling, much more so than traditional
> SATA/SAS/SCSI drives.
I recently found a tool named "Scrutiny" that presents a nice dashboard
of all your disk devices and their SMART data including crucial poin
Hi all,
> Am 25.01.2024 um 00:47 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes
> :
>
>> I would agree personally, to moving to ports (eg ports/sysutils) with
>> a DEPRECATED in the DESCR or something, or better yet a Make
>> invokation event to say "superceded, here is how to proceed against
>> advice") or something
Hi folks,
that's a really interesting polite and constructive discussion going on here,
and a trip down history lane to boot :-)
I just want to add one thing to Warner's last argument:
> Am 14.01.2024 um 18:58 schrieb Warner Losh :
> Though in all honesty, I've never been able to measure a speed
Hi all,
> Am 02.01.2024 um 13:56 schrieb Jan Bramkamp :
>
> IPv6 enabled interfaces need a link-local address for normal operation.
> Please set the auto-linklocal flag on the bridge and try again.
And remove the link-local address from alc0. A bridge member must not have
any layer 3 addresses
Hi,
> Am 15.06.2023 um 19:26 schrieb bob prohaska :
> The puzzle at this point is what to do. It's looks like the
> points of interest are the lines marked "yours" and "new",
> but I'll admit to bafflement which to modify and whether
> the modifications needed include the and > characters
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:59 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 22:47:28
> +0100):
>>
>> I apologize, should have included that in the last mail.
>> This is a current FreeBSD 13.1-p2 hosting system we run.
>
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:38 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen :
>> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:26 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
>> On quick look I haven't found a place where a compatibility setting is used
>> for the rpool during the creation, so I can't point out what the ex
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:26 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> On quick look I haven't found a place where a compatibility setting is used
> for the rpool during the creation, so I can't point out what the exact
> difference is.
> Given that empty_bpobj is not in the list of the boot code, it can'
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> Attention, "upgrade" is overloaded here. "OS upgrade" will not render the
> pool unbootable (modulo bugs), but "zpool upgrade rpool" will (except we have
> provisions that zpool upgrade doesn't enable all features in case the bootfs
>
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 21:56 schrieb Warner Losh
>
> If all you do is upgrade, then no, modulo bugs that we've thankfully not had
> yet. It's when you enable something on the zpool that you can run into
> trouble, but that's true independent of upgrade :)
Thanks. That lets me sleep way better
Hi Warner,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 21:51 schrieb Warner Losh :
> Yes. For safety, boot loader upgrade is mandatory when you do a zpool upgrade
> of the root filesystem.
> It was definitely needed in the OpenZFS jump, and we've had one or two other
> flag days since.
That's a given and not a problem.
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 21:31 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> Some features are used directly when enabled. Some features go back to the
> enabled state when some conditions are met. Some features are not reversible
> without re-creating the pool (e.g. device_removal). The zzpool-features
> man-
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 21:15 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:02:52
> +0100):
>> Yet, I made it a habit to whenever I see this message:
>>
>> ---
>> status: Some supported feature
Hi,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 20:45 schrieb Alexander Leidinger :
> But "zpool set feature@edonr=enabled rpool" (or any other feature not in the
> list we talk about) would render it unbootable.
Sorry, just to be sure. So an active change of e.g. checksum or compression
algorithm
might render the syst
Hi all,
> Am 09.11.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Warner Losh :
> >>There is a fixed list of features we support in the boot loader:
> >>[...]
> >>Any feature not on this list will cause the boot loader to
> >> reject the pool.
I admit that I do not grasp the full implications of this threa
Hi,
> Am 22.08.2022 um 10:45 schrieb Peter Jeremy :
>
> On 2022-Aug-17 18:07:20 +0200, "Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
>> Isn't beadm retired in favour of bectl?
>
> bectl still has a number of bugs:
> 1) The output from "bectl list" is in filesystem
Hi all,
> Am 17.08.2022 um 18:05 schrieb Ryan Moeller :
>
>
> On 8/17/22 10:35 AM, Thomas Laus wrote:
>> I attempted to create a ZFS snapshot after upgrading this morning and
>> received this error
>>
>> # beadm create n257443
>> cannot create 'zroot/ROOT/n257443': 'snapshots_changed' is reado
Hi all,
> Am 17.08.2022 um 13:48 schrieb Idwer Vollering :
>
> $ sudo camcontrol devlist
> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
> at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada1)
>
> $ gpart show ada0 ada1
> =>40 1953525088 ada0 GPT (932G)
> 401024 1 f
Hi all,
> Am 17.08.2022 um 15:48 schrieb Nuno Teixeira :
> Today I found a new thing that might be interesting:
> Windows Subsystem for Linux or WSL (url here)
>
> I've didn't tried it yet but it makes me think if there are some advantages
> if WS were available to FreeBSD.
You understood this
Hi all,
> Am 26.04.2022 um 17:47 schrieb bob prohaska :
> If the result is unsatisfactory, self-hosting isn't impossible. I've been
> doing it for a few years now, albeit with much help from the list. On a
> Pi3 running aarch64 memory and swap are a constraint. I'd suggest 4 GB
> of swap and -j2 o
Hi all,
I just threw a bit of hardware at the problem for now.
In addition to the seven-node TuringPi that I would like to run with
FreeBSD after I cannot make Raspbian run stable even when
completely idle I have another actively cooled single CM3+ system
(the "pi8" you saw in my first post)
So
Hi all,
> Am 25.04.2022 um 21:54 schrieb Warner Losh :
> Cross installing is supported. Native installing of a cross build world isn't.
>
> When I've had to do this in the past, I've just mounted the embedded system
> on my
> beefy server under /mumble (allowing root on the embedded system for N
Hi,
> Am 25.04.2022 um 21:18 schrieb Brooks Davis :
> Cross install is not supported. As you have seen, certain tools are
> bootstrapped on the build host and used during the install process. You
> might be able to get away with nuking
> /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/legacy (or maybe tmp) a
Hi all,
getting into FreeBSD ARM64 I tried to compile a current system on a fast AMD64
VM and
now I am somewhat stuck - no help using search engines and the like.
1st step:
# checkout main aka 14-CURRENT
cd /usr/src
make -j 8 TARGET=arm64 TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 buildworld b
Hi, all,
Am 28.10.2013 um 17:49 schrieb dro...@rpi.edu:
> I notice that CAP was removed from the ports collection some time ago,
> and that there didn't seem to be any objections to that. So that's
> some more indication that appletalk isn't seeing much use.
I’d guess the main reason is that App
Hi, all,
Am 15.12.2011 um 12:18 schrieb Michael Ross:
> Following Steven Hartlands' suggestion,
> from one of my machines:
>
> /usr/ports/sysutils/dmidecode/#sysctl -a | egrep "hw.vendor|hw.product"
>
> /usr/ports/sysutils/dmidecode/#dmidecode -t 2
> # dmidecode 2.11
> SMBIOS 2.6 present.
>
> H
See: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
Regards,
Patrick
--
WEB Internet Services Systemhaus GmbH Scheffelstr. 17a76135 Karlsruhe
phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/
Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/etc/pwd.db and /etc/group for reading
before chrooting?
Regards,
Patrick
--
WEB Internet Services Systemhaus GmbH Scheffelstr. 17a76135 Karlsruhe
phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/
Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mark!
> I installed a fresh 4.0 release candidate this morning, including the
> crypto stuff (des, kerberos...). Tried to install openssh from ports
> tree as well, but couldn't. It was looking for
> /usr/include/openssl/rsa.h which was not there, and I couldn't find a
> knob to turn RSA requi
o all the ports have to be changed
or will pcm eventually provide all the functions of snd?
Regards,
Patrick
--
WEB Internet Services Systemhaus GmbH Scheffelstr. 17a76135 Karlsruhe
phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/
Patrick M. Hausen Tec
76135 Karlsruhe
phone +49 721 9109 0 fax +49 721 9109 100 http://www.punkt.de/
Patrick M. Hausen Technical Director email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi all!
Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > Why does "make update" in /usr/src also include a cvsup of /usr/ports?
> >
> > Since /usr/ports and /usr/docs have Makefiles and "update" targets
> > of their own, and the alternative upd
Hi all!
Charon wrote:
> At 02:40 PM 2/7/00 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> >Why have there not been any snapshots of 4.0-CURRENT since 01/27/2000?
> >(current.freebsd.org). Just curious...
>
> I've been trying to get a recent snapshot for a while too... There haven't
> been any since 2
Hi!
> This happened to me on the last 3 'current' days:
>
> ===> lib/libcrypt
> install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libscrypt.a /usr/lib
> install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libscrypt_p.a /usr/lib
> install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 -fschg libscrypt.so.2 /usr/lib
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.
42 matches
Mail list logo
