On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 11:38:00PM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't be the fdimage tool for creating
> disk images under DOS on the first cd of 5.0-RC2 (and later RELEASE)?
Yes, fdimage is one of many tools that should be included in the
'tools' directory on t
Thanks to everyone who has helped focus on getting 5.0-CURRENT (now
5.0-RC) into shape the upcoming release. We're one milestone closer
today with the immediate availability of the first release candidate
for the i386, alpha, sparc64, and ia64 platforms. ISO images and FTP
installation director
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
> yesterday's -current was will affect DP2. I rather expected the release
> engineers to at least querry the lists to ask what the known issues are
> before picking whic
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:08:32AM -0400, Rod Smith wrote:
> According to the timetable at
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/schedule.html, DP2 for FreeBSD 5.0
I've updated that timetable to remove the specific date (it may take
up to 24 hours for the website to be updated). We're activel
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:33:38AM -0400, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
> Yup, it's been reported several times by various people and it seems
> everyone
> who can help is too busy to care.
>
> "This isn't fun anymore". :-(
Uhm, did I miss something? Where does this attitude come from? Did
you su
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
> the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
> have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
> problem that I know of which is a problem that
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:51:16AM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> The errormessage I get is:
>
> rl0: Irq 5 at device 2.0 pci 1
> Couldn't map ports/memory
> device_probe_and_attatch( rl0 attatch retuned 6)
Is "PNP OS installed" selected in your BIOS? If so, try without this
option set.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:26:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> So far, the only other oddity I've noticed is that when I added
> the src distribution, all of the files were set 444. The directories have
> 755 permissions.
Ahh. The problem here is related to the hoop we had to jump throug
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 03:24:08PM +0200, Andrew Bliznak wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Masahide -mac- NODA wrote:
>
> Same here, solid lock, debug key not work. If I setup X to use /dev/ums0
> computer hang just after startx. All worked with kernel/world from Mar 12.
"Me too".
In my case I use
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 02:13:16AM -0800, Annelise Anderson wrote:
> > The source will be on the CDROM. Nor is there any major importance to
> > DP1. Are you also upset that you cannot reproduce the July 17th, 1998
> > -CURRENT snapshot CD from WC?
> >
> If a tag was laid down can't it be retri
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:08:43AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Minimally, pick a date, and then do a CVS diff against that
> date, and include it on the CDROM.
I would be happy to do this. I checked out a copy of the CVS tree
right before we made the Perforce branch so that we could tag it l
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 02:08:51PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I think it's an incredibly bad idea that we are not going
> to be able to reproduce what went onto any given CDROM in
> ten years.
I agree that it is very important to be able to reproduce official
releases of FreeBSD N years dow
Thanks for your cooperation in keeping -CURRENT relatively stable
over the past week. Due to a request from the CVS administrators, we
are performing the code branch in the Perforce depot under
//depot/releng/5_dp1/. Commits to this Perforce branch require re@
approval.
This is not going to
As part of the release documentation for 5.0 DP1, we would like to
provide a comprehensive testing guide. If you have code in -CURRENT
that you would like to receive feedback on from the developer preview,
then please submit a short email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following:
1. A brie
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:40:08PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> If this is going to be a "static" release (calling it RELENG_5_anything is
> a mistake IMHO) then this isn't a big deal. But if people are expecting
> it to have ongoing secirity fixes etc like we do with RELENG_4_5 etc then
> we have
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 03:32:00AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Differences of opinion on naming aside...the branch isn't supposed to
> > last long at all. The point is to provide a slightly polished snapshot
> > to the wider developer communi
Does anyone have suggestions for additional packages that should be
included on the upcoming Developer Preview snapshot that are not
already listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh? The
only changes since the release of 4.5 have been the inclusion of samba
and the upgrade to emacs
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:55:29PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind here is that this is still going to be
> a snapshot of -current, and not a production release of -stable.
> We want a snapshot that does not have any serious problems, but
> "innocent users" should still
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:28:24AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> Should I postpone my allocator commit then?
Hi Jeff,
Yes, I would prefer to wait a week on this. After we've created
the RELENG_5_0_DP1 branch, you may commit the new allocator code to
-CURRENT. That will give us plenty of tim
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:33:27AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Shouldn't this be CC'ed to -doc as well? Maybe someone will write
> an article on a little release note kinda thing for this issue. Just
> an opinion from a -current user. :)
We're collecting notes for a "Testing Guide" similar t
As discussed at BSDCon, the release engineers are committed to
releasing a relatively stable snapshot of FreeBSD -CURRENT on or
around April 1, 2002. Obviously, a lot of major components are still
in progress, but a great deal of work has already been accomplished,
and could benefit from the a
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:25:01PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:17:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Last I checked, 'make release' checks the sources out from CVS, and is
> > > therefore useless to test ch
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:19:01AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> murray> I'm currently looking into #2 and #3, as well as working with Ted
> murray> Lemon from the ISC to fix some symbol pollution that this whole mess
> murray> has exposed. Any other ideas?
>
> Currently nothing, it seems th
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 06:16:20PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:
> I am using isc-dhcp3-3.0.r12 with DDNS on my FreeBSD 4.3 router a long time
> and have no problem. Shall this msg mean the port is completly integrated in
> freebsd 5?
Only the client is built as part of the base system. I think th
DHCP 3.0.1 RC6 has been imported into -CURRENT.
DHCP 3.x provides DHCP failover support, dynamic DNS updates, and much
more.
http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/dhcp-prerelease.html
I've done testing with some Alpha and i386 machines on my local
network, but it's certainly possible that the new
25 matches
Mail list logo
