PC Card Ethernet attach fails in -CURRENT (FA410TX on ThinkPad 240X)

I happily installed 5.1 on this laptop over the network using my NETGEAR FA410TX PCMCIA card, but on updating to -CURRENT the attach fails. Verbose boots from both 5.1-RELEASE and -CURRENT are appended, but the vital difference is this: ed1: at port 0x100-0x11f irq 11 function 0 config 32 on pc

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

e old enough by now to be useful... ;-) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid tha

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

e linux distribution or some microcontroller OS or something, I'm > talking about something on the scale of redhat or solaris or something) Ditto for "expr -1 + 1"... Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

+POS in /usr/bin/sort for years to come, even though it _is_ marked as (obsolete) in the manual page. Personally, I've never had reason to unwire it from my fingers. I have less qualms about removing backward compatibility for behaviour that was only ever accidental. Cheer

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

o 4.x releases would document something as deprecated before it actually broke in 5.0 (but preferably it still wouldn't break by default). Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

implementation of printf vs. puts. It means you can't futz with the implementation of the standard library in a standard way. :-) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do A

Re: Save a few hunderd kilobytes or a few hundred perl users?

r the core packages) or /usr/{opt,pkg,contrib}. "ports" would remain as they are, though (seems too late to reclaim /usr/local if you ever want to use those...). Cheers, Mark (sole member of the Reclaim /usr/local Campaign). -- Mark Valentine,

-D_FFR_TLS_O_T vs. FEATURE(access_db) in sendmail

lated. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munc

Re: diskcheckd goes nuts on /dev/cd0

OM SCSI-2 device da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2 should not be checked. ad0 is okay, it's not a flash device... It's still unsafe to clean ad* or da* in the default disckcheckd.conf. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Lab

Re: diskcheckd goes nuts on /dev/cd0

g to ad0 probably isn't safe. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We

Re: Unrecognised CBCP packet [strange problems with ppp(8)]

eers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch*and en

vnode pager panic with latest sources

at sym1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present -- END What changes should I start to make first to narrow this down? (I