On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2013 1:02 AM, "Attilio Rao" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Marcelo/Porks
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mar 22, 2013 1:02 AM, "Attilio Rao" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Marcelo/Porks
wrote:
> > Hi, I'm facing an error compiling the sysutils/fusefs-kmod.
> >
> > I'm using the CURRENT from today (2013-03-21).
> >
> > Can s
Hi, I'm facing an error compiling the sysutils/fusefs-kmod.
I'm using the CURRENT from today (2013-03-21).
Can someone using the CURRENT confirm if this also happens in your system?
How should I proceed?
Thanks in advance.
BARAD-DUR# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirro
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:04, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Marcelo/Porks
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys, I do not know if this is the correct mail list to report this.
>>
>> I'm trying to compile the port x11-wm/awesome but failed with
Hi guys, I do not know if this is the correct mail list to report this.
I'm trying to compile the port x11-wm/awesome but failed with the error:
[ 37%] Building C object CMakeFiles/awesome.dir/common/tokenize.c.o
Linking C executable awesome
[ 37%] Built target awesome
Scanning dependencies of ta
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> I run several boxes based on FreebSD 9.0-BETA1/amd64, compiled with clang.
> Since yesterday, I run on all of these
> machines into strange situations: buildworld won't build anymore, it fails
> always on all boxes at
> the very same position as
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
> in the TX path. It's quite pos
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:06, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-02-28 04:30, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>> I have a FreeBSD-CURRENT AMD64 system here that was last updated at
>> r215029.
>>
>> I'm trying to update it to r219079, but the build fails in lib/libz when
>> it tries to compile gvmat64.S. It
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 00:30, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD-CURRENT AMD64 system here that was last updated at r215029.
>
> I'm trying to update it to r219079, but the build fails in lib/libz when it
> tries to compile gvmat64.S. It looks like the Makefile here has a workaround
> for
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
>> merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possi
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi,
>
> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
> merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
> and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the revision
> we are upda
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky
>> wrote:
>>> > Should be like this: Note the structure is called "bulk_min":
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 04 June 2010 03:02:52 Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky
> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:54:17 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> >> On Thursday
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:54:17 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:50:08 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> > On Thursday 03 June 2010 16:22:33 Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jun 2
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem is that LOW speed does not support BULK transfers according to the
> USB specification. I guess we could switch that support on, though I'd rather
> stick with the spec.
>
> Try changing this line in:
>
> src/sys/dev/
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 June 2010 03:23:47 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Looks like this device might be a bit quirky... Just forwarding to you
>> to see if you had any details for the OP.
>> Thanks!
>> -Garrett
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you dump the USB desc
Hi guys. I have a device[1] that is recognized on Linux by the generic
CDC-ACM driver and I'm trying to do the same on FreeBSD current with
umodem (4). But, as you can see, I had no success:
Jun 1 20:00:54 BARAD-DUR kernel: uhub_reattach_port: port 1 reset
failed, error=USB_ERR_TIMEOUT
Jun 1 20:
On 5/27/10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Marcelo/Porks
> wrote:
>> On 5/27/10, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>&
On 5/27/10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi guys. I'm not sure if I could call this a problem but I can disable
&g
On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is
> enabled?
>
> I did some tests and seems that I can do this (logs bellow).
>
> But will SUJ work prop
On 5/17/10, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I fixed the sparse inode tunefs bug and changed the tunefs behavior based
> on discussions here on curr...@. Hopefully this works for everyone.
Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU whe
22 matches
Mail list logo
