at all is freemware (www.freemware.org), which was
started by the author of Bochs and is still very much pre-alpha. It's under
LGPL.
-lee
--
+--------+
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on WTnet) |
|
e available on the drive.
-lee
--
+--------+
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on WTnet) |
| lcreme...@erols.com | http://wakky.dyndns.org/~lee |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@fr
:)
--
++
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)|
|lcrem...@tidalwave.net| http://st-lcremean.tidalwave.net/~lee |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
can run in either bidirectional or
modem-return mode.)
--
+--------+
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)|
|lcrem...@tidalwave.net| http://st-lcremean.tidalwave.net/~lee |
To Unsubscribe: sen
ce size failed: NOT READY, Logical unit not ready,
> cause not reportable
Is the drive empty? It seems to me it's complaining because you don't have a
disk in.
--
+----+
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse o
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 04:09:27PM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> <19990125080617.a3...@tidalwave.net>Lee Cremeans writes:
> >> ide_pci0: rev 0x06 on
> >> pci0.
> >7.1
>
> Don't you know if I can upgrade only one file, ide_pci.c? STABLE seems to not
T, 512 B/S
>
> What should I check?
You need to update to 3.0-STABLE; bde committed some fixes to the VIA UDMA
code there.
--
++
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)|
|lcrem..
s on master
> drives somehow affects slave cdroms. On another system with PIIX1 and
> a MWDMA2 drive, I have no problems with the slave cdrom.
Probably because PIIX1 can't set the timings for each device individually,
and (I would assume) therefore goes with the lowest common d
#x27;t
very well fix it), but the code was written to assume that for _any_
DMA-capable drive on a generic controller. The patch I just posted limits
the force-set to UDMA drives only, like it should have been in the first
place.
--
+---
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:32:16PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday, 24 January 1999 at 23:25:42 -0500, Lee Cremeans wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 08:19:33PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> It doesn't work on my CTX box, though - heh. Quantity ver
> :
> :It's there...what symptoms are you seeing? Are you overclocking?
> :--
> :+----+
> :| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)|
>
>
> No overclocking. S
ted in 24 hours, if the Acer is newly committed then
> I'll
> have to update again and retry. The CTX is using the Acer.
>
> ide_pci0: rev 0x20 int
> a irq 0 on pci0.11.0
It's there...what symptoms are you seeing? Are you overclocki
is in this guy? There's support for anything
Intel or VIA, Promise UDMA cards, Cyrix MediaGX, and Acer Aladdin IV/V right
now.
--
+--------+
| Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)|
|lcrem...@tidal
:-Alfred
>
> I don't know.
>
> I wasn't aware that there was a problem with crash dumps on
> ide disks. There shouldn't be.
FWIW, I've had crash dumps enabled on my IDE-based system for a long time,
and never had a problem with them.
--
+-
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 09:29:19PM +, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> Lee Cremeans wrote:
>
> > > The machine is a dual P90 (running SMP) - I get the problems even with a
> > > single CPU kernel... It's running Neptune chipset (quite old) - and only
> >
-- does it
always seem to happen in the same place on the disk?
I have no love lost for Neptune boards; we have two of them at work,
and it's like trying to work with a 486 board with an OverDrive chip on it.
I'm also wary of Intel boards in general, since they tend to think they'r
16 matches
Mail list logo
