Peter Kadau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi !
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning%20Options
>
> Hmm, that's exactly as in the info page.
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/C---Dialect-Options.html#C++%20Dialect%20Options
>
> > and search f
Peter Kadau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi !
>
> > Then configure runs gcc with wrong parameters. In GCC 3.3 -pedantic implies
> > -pedantic-error, unless -fpermissive is specified too.
>
> ??? The info page doesn't say so.
> If one can't trust the GNU info pages - what a mess,
> considered th
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [snip]
> >
> > Curiosity: Why does this suppression get disabled in the imported compiler?
>
> I guess justification was to see warnings about FreeBSD's own header
> files. We dont want to hide warnings in them, we want to fix issues
> warnings rep
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Warner mentioned this was due to the gcc import. Nearly every part of the
> kernel that uses newbus or buf.h prints out lots of warnings. Can someone
> see about fixing this, whether it's by fixing our headers or build flags
> or gcc itself? I've alread
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [For some reason I haven't seen Alexander's post yet, so I'm mixing
> replies here.]
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:12:10PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Friday 18 July 2003 17:37, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:3
Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Christian Brueffer wrote:
>
> > ===> lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo
> > cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium2
> > -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../../../contrib/openpam/include
> > -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_echo/../../libp
