On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 02:54, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> Please test a pcm patch that releases the channel lock around
> calls to uio move. This is a more complete patch than the previous
> one as it also does the _read routine. I will ask the RE to commit
> this if I hear a couple of "it works".
I
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 17:04, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> I don't get any mouse lag anymore in the 'cd /usr/src ; make clean ;
make
> cleandir' and the beginner of 'portupgrade -ra'. I did the hard test;
I
> have Gnome2, Opera 7 (linux version), several gvim, several
gnome-terminal
> tabs, pan and
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:45, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> A ULE UP kernel compiled fresh tonight (2003-10-28). Not critical,
> but certainly interesting. -sc
Anybody running ULE + KSE on an SMP kernel without any problems?
My symptoms are as such:
- idle and total cpu usage never goes above 54%
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 16:07, Doug Barton wrote:
> Any occurences of -lc_r should be changed to ${PTHREAD_LIBS} too.
Seems that -lc_r is set by default in bsd.port.mk for ${PTHREAD_LIBS}.
Does it mean that we should be able to specify a pthread library in
future as a make option for installing po
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilte
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The process stats are not updated properly under ULE at the moment.
> If a process takes up 60% of CPU and then sleeps, top will continue to
> show it at 60% until the next time it runs. It does not in fact
> continue to use CPU.
In my case if
Trying out ULE scheduling on an SMP machine causes background processes
to be stuck in locks.
One or two processes will always get stuck in *Giant (and takes up like
60% of lock) and if these are killed, then other processes are always
taking up a total of around 10% in lock, which makes the syste
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 11:55, John Reynolds wrote:
> Anybody seeing this same error during "buildworld"?
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc
> makeinfo --no-split -I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc -I
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc/../../../../contrib/cvs/doc
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc/../../../../contri
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 16:55, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> Excellent debugging. Can you tell me whats in kseq_cpu[0] and
> kseq_cpu[1]? I think I may know what the problem is. Do you have some
> negative niced processes or some positive nice processes?
Just tried the fix, and tried out ULE with KSE (u
First of all thanks to Julian Elisher who gave hints on what might be
wrong (userland/kernel), even though I was a blockhead for not enabling
debugging options in the kernel before posting. It help me track down
broken stuff in userland first. I hope I can give proper helpful debug
info next time I
I was trying to get core or some sort of trace for what I think are kse
related, but I get this instead.
Randomly after this during various operations, my system totally locks
up (I don't know enough, whether it's related or not).
lock order reversal
1st 0xc40bb540 pcm0 (sound softc) @
/usr/src
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:24, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:22:06PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:00, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> >
> > > For the first time I compile current-p3 -> current-p4 with
> > > -march=pentium2 -O2
p, http, etc.
I can confirm this. nat fails to work with -O2 for usr.sbin/ppp. It
compiles cleanly though, but I don't know enough about gcc optimizations
to find out how O2 might break it.
--
Khairil Yusof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
13 matches
Mail list logo
