On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, I also believe that when UVM maps those pages, it makes them
> copy-on-write so I/O can be initiated on the data without having to
> stall anyone attempting to make further modifications to
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 08:36:19 +0800
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how does it handle the problem of small 512 byte
> directories? Does it consume a whole page or does it do something smarter?
> Or does the ubc work apply to read/write only and the filesystem itsel
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:15:29 -0800
"Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> I can say that our implementation doesn't seem to =
> suffer from this problem. Could be there's an issue in the use of =
> PRUS_* v. the socket state we use. The code in my kernel looks like:
The NetBSD code looks pretty muc
