RE: [acpi-jp 2105] Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp> i/downloads/CHANGES.txt > > I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from > iwasaki@ Another release is imminent. Or, if you decide to go with what's out there now there is on

RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-27 Thread Grover, Andrew
; To: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; Grover, Andrew; Moore, Robert > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed! > > > > The deleted object problem has been fixed in the 20021122 > release which

RE: [acpi-jp 1750] Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20020815

2002-08-27 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Moore, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > 1) Fix the ASL so that it compiles without errors or warnings > 2) Override the BIOS version of the table with your new one. > (I don't know > how this is done on FreeBSD, someone else will have to help you. ISTR someone (Iwasaki-san?) had a p

RE: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-23 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Ducrot Bruno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > there is a little detail that I don't understand actually. When we > want to enter S4 in: > > sys/contrib/dev/acpica/hwsleep.c::AcpiEnterSleepState > > we have to fill PM1AControl and PM1BControl with some values > deduced by > the DSDT. Thos

RE: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Michael Nottebrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > You are right. My PC supports this via BIOS too. The > > disadvantage is, that the bios handle it. I like W2K's > > feature to do it ACPI based (?). This gives my the freedom > > to suspend my W2K to disk and to reboot with FBSD. Later I >