This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
has hooks into all the networking code, does this
become an issue on slow or otherwis
Is there a possibility of a generalized interface where any linux kernel module
could be loaded, in the event that the linux emulator were loaded? Or would
this require running the linux kernel in RAM, and therefore running two virtual
machines?
On Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:12 PM, Alfred P
MTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:56:03AM -0800, Glen Gross wrote:
> > I previously posted this to stable, but received no response. Has anyone
> > seen
> > this?
> >
> > After my latest make world, I find I am now experiencing some
I previously posted this to stable, but received no response. Has anyone seen
this?
After my latest make world, I find I am now experiencing some PAM error when I
log in:
Dec 8 10:22:33 bsd login: auth_pam: Module is unknown
Dec 8 16:14:17 bsd login: unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_deny.s
Thanks, I suppose I should have been able to figure that one out... if I could
log in! I will fix it when I get home. :-)
On Thursday, October 26, 2000 1:32 PM, Bill Fumerola [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:31:03PM -0700, Glen Gross wrote:
> >
> >
I built a 4.1.1 kernel, and the module was built, but when I load the ipfw
module with
#kldload ipfw
it defaults to a deny_all policy, even though I have default_to_accept in my
kernel configuration.
This makes it difficult to configure remotely without getting locked out of the
system.
Is t
-Original Message-
From: Glendon Gross [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 6:23 AM
To: Bjoern Fischer
Cc: Cameron Grant; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: problem w/ new pcm feeder + emu10k1 in 4.1.1-stable
I wonder if this has anything to do with why
