Re[2]: ATAng: completely broken? Trouble with HPT370 on 4.9RC3

2003-10-26 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Janet, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 1:52:52 PM, you wrote: > Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: >> Further, 4.9RC3 also gives me headaches with HPT370 but seems to work ok with >> Promise RAID, didn't try SATA or VT8325 so far. I'd definitely vote >> for delaying 4.9 unt

ATAng: completely broken? Trouble with HPT370 on 4.9RC3

2003-10-26 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
ATAng seems to cause nothing but trouble for me. It won't recognize HPT370 arrays at all (whereas older 5.1 Kernels work perfectly) and just goes on complaining it can't mount root from it. Promise RAID is somewhat better (can mount root from it but goes on telling me one of the subdisks is down wh

Re[2]: Kernel maybe borked...

2003-10-18 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi John Hay, you wrote. JH> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JH> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JH> Received: (qmail 61696 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2003 16:55:08 - JH> Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (216.136.204.119) JH> by 0 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2003 16:55:08 - JH> Received: from hub

Re[2]: ATA broken as of yesterday?

2003-10-10 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Bruno Van Den Bossche, you wrote. BVDB> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:36:12 +0200 BVDB> Gabriel Ambuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A machine I had recompiled with a CVSUP as of yesterday (and again >> today, to no avail) can't mount root from a HPT370 (/dev/ar0s1a)

ATA broken as of yesterday?

2003-10-09 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
A machine I had recompiled with a CVSUP as of yesterday (and again today, to no avail) can't mount root from a HPT370 (/dev/ar0s1a) RAID 1 array anymore, with the saved old kernel (two weeks or so I think) it boots without any trouble. Regards, Gabriel ___

Re: New SATA Hardware

2003-10-02 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Steve Ames, you wrote. SA> G'day. SA> My company is putting together a system with lots of file SA> system on it to do disk based backup. SA> Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing SA> optimally) SATA RAID controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What SA> manufacturer/model of SATA

Re[2]: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-10-01 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Soren Schmidt, you wrote. SS> It seems Will Andrews wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: >> > No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a >> > marvell PATA->SATA converter "on board", its not a "pure" SATA >> > design, but just the old st

Re[2]: SiL3112 SATA (RAID) Controller drives aren't working at all.

2003-09-30 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Derek Ragona, you wrote. DR> My troublesome system uses an Adaptec Serial ATA RAID 1210SA which has the DR> SiI3112 RAID chip. I have only one drive connected, so no RAID functionality. DR> Here is my verbose dmesg using the 9/28/03 snapshot: DR> http://www.computinginnovations.com/dmesg.html

SiL3112 SATA (RAID) Controller drives aren't working at all.

2003-09-29 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
The drivers in 28.9.JPSNAP of current will allow you to install FreeBSD on a SATA disk connected to a Silicon Image 3112 SATA RAID controller but not much more. Shortly after booting, the system will start getting UDMA timeouts and basically just freezes. Furthermore, the disks connected to the con

Re[2]: Sil680 RAID Support while installing 5.1-Release

2003-09-28 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello Derek, Saturday, September 27, 2003, 8:50:21 PM, you wrote: > Gabriel, > I experienced the same problem using 5.1 release with an Adaptec SATA > Raid card that uses the SATA Sil3112A chip. > With 5.1-CURRENT I can get FreeBSD to install, but the server locks-up > because the disk subsyste

Re: Sil680 RAID Support while installing 5.1-Release

2003-09-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Travis Troyer, you wrote. TT> I just purchased a Sil680 IDE RAID controller, and have setup TT> a striped RAID array. When I boot from the 5.1 installation TT> CD-ROM, FreeBSD does not recognize them as one disk. I TT> checked the hardware notes, and "Sil680 UDMA6" is listed. TT> Seeing Sil6

microuptime went backwards

2002-01-26 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I just installed 5 CURRENT (20.1. snapshot) on a K6-2 500 whic was previously running 4.4 STABLE without any problems but since CURRENT is running, it keeps printing error messages about microuptime went backwards which doesn't seem to hurt the system its

Re: cvsupit assumptions (was: Re: Re[2]: Can't build current...)

2001-03-28 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Robert, Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 8:19:42 PM, you wrote: > I've actually heard that from a couple of other people lately -- that > cvsupit still assumes that crypto should not be pulled down, and the > crypto code is now assumed in the default build. Thi

Re[2]: Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Makoto, Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 7:55:15 PM, you wrote: gabriel_ambuehl>> I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. > You should have src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c. If you don't > have, it's your problem. The CVS reposit

Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. I just cvsupped again (tracking everything on CURRENT branch) but I always run into the following: sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libmd.a /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/

Can't build current...

2001-03-27 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I can't seem to be able to build 5-CURRENT since several days. I just cvsupped again (tracking everything on CURRENT branch) but I always run into the following: sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libmd.a /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/