On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:30:42AM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:34:41PM -0400, a little birdie told me
> that Garance A Drosihn remarked
> > At 11:18 PM -0700 7/17/01, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > >If I had to guess, I'd put the total [genuine] -current userbase
> >
> In the web CVS repository, $FreeBSD$ expands to version 1.16
> In my local version, $FreeBSD$ is expanded to version 1.15
>
> What could explain this?
As someone already mentioned, you may have -k set for that file.
If you don't know, send us the output of cvs status immio.c
some modifications to policy
and more importantly to attitude
The general realization is most productive, but you have to go around all
the bickering.
Nothing really.
We now return to regularly scheduled programming.
gh
> -matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
> > I have to laugh. Sorry if you don't that helps. S'long then. I've no
> > more time for the likes of you.
>
> *rolls eyes* Man, some people are hard to work in a team with.
You guys are still trying to pass this off as a team??
*boggle*
gh
(Yeah yeah, un
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:54:50AM +0200, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> Gentlemen,
>
> Please? I will happily supply you with ample quantities of quality
> Dutch mud to sling at one another. But please do so in private?
But think of the money we'll save on wrestling ticke
ributed
> under GPL. And building libgmp into openssl would require exactly that.
*snip*
Oh, I see.
Nevermind then, sounds good. (Somehow I missed the libgmp<->GPL
relationship.)
gh
(Apologies to the CC's who didn't need this aside.)
> Cheers,
> -Peter
> --
> Peter
ing effort to plug in?
You propose that people remove the currently implemented and more
efficient library and replace it with a less-efficient library of
non-native BSD origin?
Really? This hardly seems like a good idea.
gh
> Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
his magnitude of Really Bad Stuffage snuck into the
codebase before?
(This is just for my personal knowledge. I don't remeber anything this
bad in recent times.)
gh
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 06:03:57PM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> I read something (somewhere) about speeding up buildworlds with a ramdisk
> mounted to /usr/obj *IF* you have a lot of RAM but I cant seem to find it
> anymore. Any help? What are you guys doing to speed up your worlds? Ar
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:40:37PM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:42:22PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Okay, are there any known problems with the SB128 cards? Figuring that it
> > couldn't hurt to remove it, I did ... so far, X hasn't hung ... not
>
>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:27:24AM +0530, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> unsubscribe freebsd-current
You need to send messages like this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, we tell you this at the bottom of every mail from the list.
;-)
dan
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
> IF and ONLY IF the PNPBIOS code is causing your machine to fail, do the
> following:
>
> - Send me FULL DETAILS; this will need to include the trap messages and,
>if the trap is in the kernel, a DDB traceback.
>
The described situation actually occured to me tonight (5-28-2000) while
tryin
For an opinion from a reasonably new-comer and non-developer, I think at
least the main source tree should remain *completely* complete.
As someone mentioned, why not have "lite" mirrors?
Dan K.
gh
| On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 25 Apr 20
13 matches
Mail list logo
