On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:18:05PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Hi Folks,
> :
> : I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient.
> :
> : Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exis
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:52:19AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> But the interface adding does still not work. Maybe a different
> syntax than this ?
>
> connect
> new interface
> open
> set rl0 = "up";
> update
> close
I think you want this syntax (although I still couldn't get it to work):
conn
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:01:36PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > > can access dhclient (or dhcpd) on the local machine without authentification.
> >
> > You can get omshell working without auth over tcp/ip - I managed this
> > today when playing. But a unix domain socket would be nicer because
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:56:48AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
> be used with one interface, but several.
Yay! This bites me badly on my laptop with a permanent fxp0 and a
sometimes-present wi0.
> On a well known OS this work
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I'll stick with something that works, and works fast. I'm well aware
> of the security issues, and have determined the risk to be
> insignificant for the way I use a Web browser. (And frankly, I don't
> much care what lusing Web-design weenies think about it.)
Well, tha
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:04:57PM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Just to confirm, I've just seen this on my i386 laptop (sony Z600TEK),
> too, which has a fresh cvsup and build from about 2.5 hours ago.
> Attached is a dmesg from my kernel.old which I've just manage to
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:07:34PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> ...
> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa0
> sio0: type 16550A, console
> sio0: interrupting at ISA irq 4
> sio1: reserved for low-level i/o
> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 11:48:16PM +0300, Ilya Naumov wrote:
> i've tried to build XFree86 4.0 on my 5.0-CURRENT and 4.0-RELEASE box, and
>encountered
> a problem.
>
> "make all" finishes successfully, but "make install" fails with the
> following error message:
>
> making all in programs/Xserv
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 07:51:28AM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Someone mentioned that sysinstall could be scripted... is this the way
> to go, then?
It's one way to go, although it's not as good as Solaris' JumpStart
(although that has faults of it's own...). For a quick example look in
/usr
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 06:41:07AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> True, but it would be nice if the man page was extended to
> include some more documentation. Remember, a lot of our users are
> lazy and if "man x" doesn't give them what they want, then
> they don't go looking elsewhere. Sad
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 06:03:19AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> > Speaking of which, are there any plans to actually document vi any time
> > soon? Lots of useful features are missing from the man page!
>
> Sure! Where are your patches for this? I'll review them
> and commit them as soon as
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 10:56:42AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> Just to avoid duplicated effort: I currently have work in progress
> on a "fslog" pseudo-device. It enables you to monitor a filesystem
> and receive notifications for all interesting changes to files and
> directories. This includ
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 09:31:48AM +0300, Hristo Grigorov wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ???
Well, somebody should probably contact freshmeat and let them know that
it's not an "official" release as such.
Unless, of course, we want the ability to submit daily snapshots to
freshmeat. :-)
--
Dom Mi
Any ideas on who dsubmitted this to freshmeat?
-Dom
- Forwarded message from freshmeat daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 19 Aug 1999 03:59:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: freshmeat daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [fm/news] newsletter for Aug 18th 1999, 23:59
This is the offic
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 02:54:53PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> kern.modules seems to be slightly more general in that you can
> have kern.modules.xxx where xxx is anything under /modules that
> needs/wants to some tuning via sysctl.
This is daft. Given that we are planning on makeing everything
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 09:54:48AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 04:24:55AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> > Perhaps this should be a PR...
> >
> > Seeing as how we are recently being amused by fortune(6) quotes, I thought
> > I'd mention a
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 04:24:55AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Perhaps this should be a PR...
>
> Seeing as how we are recently being amused by fortune(6) quotes, I thought
> I'd mention an acronymn that hasn't been used recently: POLA
>
> Can anyone explain why every time I upgrade world, my h
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 07:05:10PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Most active committers are in the States if you look at the frequency
> > of commit messages.
>
> > The European morning is the safest I guess.
>
> 'till you get to build ppp and bump into the cr*p I com
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 10:01:18AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> I realise that will stop the panic from looking at the source code, but
> :> surely it's just covering up the problem and waiting for it to happen
> :> later?
> :>
> :I'm pretty it's caused by the INVARIANTS option, similar incid
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:18:42PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > I realise that will stop the panic from looking at the source code, but
> > surely it's just covering up the problem and waiting for it to happen
> > later?
> >
> I'm pretty it's caused by the INVARIANTS option, similar incidents have
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:08:07AM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > I've been getting this panic when I've installed new kernels the last
> > couple of times. The panic is occuring when I have freshly booted the
> > system with a new kernel and logged on for the first time. It appears
> > to occur a
I've been getting this panic when I've installed new kernels the last
couple of times. The panic is occuring when I have freshly booted the
system with a new kernel and logged on for the first time. It appears
to occur at the point at which I start fetchmail in my profile, FWIW.
BTW: My home di
Is there any way to specify a realm with whitespace to fetch? I've
just had a fun time trying to do:
% export HTTP_AUTH="basic:SunSolve Online:x:y"
% fetch -v http://online.sunsolve.sun.co.uk/whatever
senddoc: cannot authenticate with server
Looking at the code it appears that there isn't a way
I know this is probably a daft question, but how does one tell what
nfs version a mount is? I thought that plain old mount(8) would do the
trick, but it doesn't.
Any ideas?
--
Dom Mitchell -- Palmer & Harvey McLane -- Unix Systems Administrator
"It's amazing how much you miss -good- Unix comman
24 matches
Mail list logo
