I had to change ACL attributes too (+x) to two files:
/usr/src/sys/dev/bhnd/tools/nvram_map_gen.sh
/usr/src/sys/dev/bhnd/tools/nvram_map_gen.awk
Thanks
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Cristiano Deana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while compiling kernel I got:
>
> x86 -> /usr/src/sys/x86/
Hi,
while compiling kernel I got:
x86 -> /usr/src/sys/x86/include
/usr/src/sys/dev/bhnd/tools/nvram_map_gen.sh
/usr/src/sys/dev/bhnd/nvram/nvram_map -h
bmake[4]: exec(/usr/src/sys/dev/bhnd/tools/nvram_map_gen.sh) failed
(Permission denied)
*** Error code 1
Stop.
I saw another thread with the sa
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
> We are starting the release process of pkg 1.4, we want to have a better
> release
> process than with every single previous version of pkg. For that we will need
> you help!
glad to help.
I'd like to test it on a 10 sy
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
Hi
Thanks for this URL, I've meet this problem on my FreeBSD 9.2 few
> weeks ago (public NTP registered in the pool.ntp.org).
>
Same for me.
>
> There is a thread on the ntp.org ML about this too:
> http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/po
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> Does it have a CVE? The article is low on content
>
>
I don't think so. I think there were lot of ideas about the DDoS, that's
the only article suggesting a right solution (in my experience).
I think they are still investigating.
Italian FreeB
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> > There is a bug in older versions (< 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
> > server to DDoS. This has been corrected in new version:
> > https://cert.litnet.lt/en/docs/ntp-distributed-reflection-dos-attacks
> >
> > This attack seems to be in
Hi,
is it possible to include in base system of the upcoming 10.0 the new
version of ntp (4.2.7 instead of 4.2.4)?
There is a bug in older versions (< 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
server to DDoS. This has been corrected in new version:
https://cert.litnet.lt/en/docs/ntp-distributed-refle
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> The error in your first email was clearly a warning being promoted to
> an error, so either you had a different error on your build with
> NO_WERROR/WERROR, or your NO_WERROR/WERROR settings were not being
> respected. Please retry with NO_WERR
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> Top of the '[TESTING] Clang..' email:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision 104832 which is what we aim to
>> import
>> into HEAD in roughly a week. We would like the initial import to be as
>> painless
>> as possible and
# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Jun 22 16:04:38
CEST 2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# cat /etc/src.conf
#NO_WERROR=
#WERROR=
CC= clang
CXX=clang++
sources from this morning, i got this error:
clang -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/inc
10 matches
Mail list logo