Hi,
Since the big fixes in the pccard code (by Warner Losh), at a date that
I
can't remember of because I was busy at this time but it
Hi,
Those problems are solved if I switch back to the old scheduler (SCHED_4BSD).
Moreover, with the new scheduler, under high load (CPU ~100%) the system became
very slow.
-- Aurelien
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:42:36AM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For about two weeks
Hi,
I've got the same problem after a panic, the produced core dump was invalid.
I'm on -CURRENT and I think the reason of the core production isn't the same as
you, but the core dump problem is the same, I'm sure of it.
I'm also on a laptop (Compaq Presarion) but ACPI is enabled.
I have removed
Hi,
For about two weeks now, each time I halt my computer, all the buffers are not
synced (sometimes they are 1, 2 or 5).
Moreover, when I compile my custom kernel, at the linking stage ("linking
kernel.debug") I got ENOMEM at 0xadress(ad0s1g) (ad0s1g is my /usr slice) (
a time I even got a panic
Hi,
With a fresh -CURRENT tree, I got:
cc -fno-merge-constants -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-unin
itialized -c /usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c -o rules.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c: In function `Check_Chunk':
/usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c
Hi,
You _must_ add SCHED_4BSD (old scheduler) or SCHED_ULE (new scheduler) to your
config file.
-- Aurelien
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:35:00PM +, Trent Nelson wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a result of the recent sched_ule import, but
> buildkernel is dying on a bunch of undefined
Hi,
With a fresh -CURRENT, when I do a "arp -a", I got:
../../../kern/kern_sysctl.c:1002: could sleep with "radix node head" locked from
../../../net/rtsock.c:1033
../../../kern/kern_sysctl.c:1002: could sleep with "radix node head" locked from
../../../net/rtsock.c:1033
../../../kern/kern_sysc
>
> Hum ... the previous patch against bpf.c was the result of multiple test, thus
> it was _VERY_ ugly with useless lines of code... now the new one is cleaner :)
> (it's just aesthetic modifications but ... better for the eyes :p)
>
> -- Aurelien
@!#~& *tired* here is the ghost patch ... sorr
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 09:58:19PM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've found a bug in the BPF stack (if I can call it a stack :p).
> According to the bpf man, packets can be written directly through a bpf file
> descriptor. But writing IP packets using wri
Hi,
I think I've found a bug in the BPF stack (if I can call it a stack :p).
According to the bpf man, packets can be written directly through a bpf file
descriptor. But writing IP packets using write() doesn't seem to work, the
"ip_len" field of the ip header isn't sent in host byte order so the
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:18:45AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/
> >I've attached the error log.
> >
> >Any help would be appreciated
Hi,
I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/
I've attached the error log.
Any help would be appreciated :)
-- Aurelien
Script started on Sun Dec 22 22:34:05 2002
[m[27m[Jnebula% [K[70C~[71Dsstartx
xauth: (argv):1: bad display name "nebula.wanadoo.fr:0" i
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:50:42AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I have managed to panic my system on a hard reboot and now believe
> that I have found the problem on which you are faulting. I have
> checked in a fix to the head of the tree (sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c
> version 1.57). Let me know i
>
> By hard shutdown I assume you mean hitting the reset button while
> the machine is busily running along? If so, my test machine passes
> that test. I'll keep plugging away at it though in the hopes of
> getting it to fail.
>
> Kirk McKusick
Yes, that's what I meant. My main box is a la
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:00:19AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I corrected a botched patch last night. Make sure that you are running
> with version 1.56 2002/12/18 07:19:41 of ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.
>
> Kirk McKusick
>
> =-=-=-=-=
>
nebula# ident /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c
/u
> I introduced a bug to snapshots on 11/30/02 which did not get fixed
> until 12/15/02 which caused background fsck to (silently) fail to fix
> certain filesystem problems. If you ran background fsck on a system
> between 11/30 and 12/15 and then ran background fsck again on a system
> after that
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote:
> On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted
> UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs.
>
> -Steve
>
Maybe dumpfs(8) will help you.
-- Aurelien
msg48915/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I got a panic today which occured during a background fsck, after a hard-reboot
of the system. The dump from gdb is attached and I can, of course, provide more
infos if needed.
-- Aurelien
Script started on Mon Dec 16 22:08:36 2002
[m[27m[Jnebula# [K[39C/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NEBULA
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:43:23AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : Aurelien Nephtali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
Hi,
I've got a panic by unplugging my NIC then plugging it again and then doing
a dhclient . I've attached some informations about the panic.
-- Aurélien
Script started on Tue Nov 26 20:17:13 2002
[m[27m[Jnebula# [K[47C/sys/i386/compile/NEBULA[71Dggdb -k
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyri
Hi,
I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a pointer ?
Sometimes I have some pointers which have a correct value before and suddenly
they got this odd 0xd0d0d0d0 value :/
-- Aurélien
msg46431/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo