DMA failed to complete' and 'packets buffered, but transmitter idle

2003-06-25 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, Since the big fixes in the pccard code (by Warner Losh), at a date that I can't remember of because I was busy at this time but it

[SOLVED (NEW SCHEDULER FAULT)] Re: Disk problems (buffers unsynced)

2003-02-12 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, Those problems are solved if I switch back to the old scheduler (SCHED_4BSD). Moreover, with the new scheduler, under high load (CPU ~100%) the system became very slow. -- Aurelien On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:42:36AM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote: > Hi, > > For about two weeks

Re: Corrupted crashdump?

2003-02-08 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I've got the same problem after a panic, the produced core dump was invalid. I'm on -CURRENT and I think the reason of the core production isn't the same as you, but the core dump problem is the same, I'm sure of it. I'm also on a laptop (Compaq Presarion) but ACPI is enabled. I have removed

Disk problems (buffers unsynced)

2003-02-06 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, For about two weeks now, each time I halt my computer, all the buffers are not synced (sometimes they are 1, 2 or 5). Moreover, when I compile my custom kernel, at the linking stage ("linking kernel.debug") I got ENOMEM at 0xadress(ad0s1g) (ad0s1g is my /usr slice) ( a time I even got a panic

make buildworld broken

2003-02-02 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, With a fresh -CURRENT tree, I got: cc -fno-merge-constants -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-unin itialized -c /usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c -o rules.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c: In function `Check_Chunk': /usr/src/lib/libdisk/rules.c

Re: buildkernel dying from unresolved sched_* symbols

2003-02-02 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, You _must_ add SCHED_4BSD (old scheduler) or SCHED_ULE (new scheduler) to your config file. -- Aurelien On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:35:00PM +, Trent Nelson wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a result of the recent sched_ule import, but > buildkernel is dying on a bunch of undefined

could sleep with "radix node head" and LOR

2002-12-25 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, With a fresh -CURRENT, when I do a "arp -a", I got: ../../../kern/kern_sysctl.c:1002: could sleep with "radix node head" locked from ../../../net/rtsock.c:1033 ../../../kern/kern_sysctl.c:1002: could sleep with "radix node head" locked from ../../../net/rtsock.c:1033 ../../../kern/kern_sysc

Re: [PATCH] Wrong behaviour of writes of IP packets through BPF fd

2002-12-24 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
> > Hum ... the previous patch against bpf.c was the result of multiple test, thus > it was _VERY_ ugly with useless lines of code... now the new one is cleaner :) > (it's just aesthetic modifications but ... better for the eyes :p) > > -- Aurelien @!#~& *tired* here is the ghost patch ... sorr

Re: [PATCH] Wrong behaviour of writes of IP packets through BPF fd

2002-12-24 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 09:58:19PM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote: > Hi, > > I think I've found a bug in the BPF stack (if I can call it a stack :p). > According to the bpf man, packets can be written directly through a bpf file > descriptor. But writing IP packets using wri

[PATCH] Wrong behaviour of writes of IP packets through BPF fd

2002-12-24 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I think I've found a bug in the BPF stack (if I can call it a stack :p). According to the bpf man, packets can be written directly through a bpf file descriptor. But writing IP packets using write() doesn't seem to work, the "ip_len" field of the ip header isn't sent in host byte order so the

Re: XFree 4.2.1 doesn't work with last CURRENT

2002-12-23 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:18:45AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Aurelien Nephtali wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/ > >I've attached the error log. > > > >Any help would be appreciated

XFree 4.2.1 doesn't work with last CURRENT

2002-12-22 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/ I've attached the error log. Any help would be appreciated :) -- Aurelien Script started on Sun Dec 22 22:34:05 2002 nebula% ~sstartx xauth: (argv):1: bad display name "nebula.wanadoo.fr:0" i

Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-18 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:50:42AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I have managed to panic my system on a hard reboot and now believe > that I have found the problem on which you are faulting. I have > checked in a fix to the head of the tree (sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c > version 1.57). Let me know i

Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-18 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
> > By hard shutdown I assume you mean hitting the reset button while > the machine is busily running along? If so, my test machine passes > that test. I'll keep plugging away at it though in the hopes of > getting it to fail. > > Kirk McKusick Yes, that's what I meant. My main box is a la

Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-18 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:00:19AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I corrected a botched patch last night. Make sure that you are running > with version 1.56 2002/12/18 07:19:41 of ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c. > > Kirk McKusick > > =-=-=-=-= > nebula# ident /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c /u

Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-18 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
> I introduced a bug to snapshots on 11/30/02 which did not get fixed > until 12/15/02 which caused background fsck to (silently) fail to fix > certain filesystem problems. If you ran background fsck on a system > between 11/30 and 12/15 and then ran background fsck again on a system > after that

Re: How to update UFS1 to UFS2?

2002-12-17 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote: > On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted > UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs. > > -Steve > Maybe dumpfs(8) will help you. -- Aurelien msg48915/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block

2002-12-16 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I got a panic today which occured during a background fsck, after a hard-reboot of the system. The dump from gdb is attached and I can, of course, provide more infos if needed. -- Aurelien Script started on Mon Dec 16 22:08:36 2002 nebula# /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NEBULA

Re: PANIC: "Most recently used by bus"

2002-11-27 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:43:23AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : Aurelien Nephtali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write

PANIC: "Most recently used by bus"

2002-11-26 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I've got a panic by unplugging my NIC then plugging it again and then doing a dhclient . I've attached some informations about the panic. -- Aurélien Script started on Tue Nov 26 20:17:13 2002 nebula# /sys/i386/compile/NEBULAggdb -k GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) Copyri

Value 0xd0d0d0d0 ?

2002-11-09 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a pointer ? Sometimes I have some pointers which have a correct value before and suddenly they got this odd 0xd0d0d0d0 value :/ -- Aurélien msg46431/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature