Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2016.04.20 07:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote: It is very worrying to see such reports without any reaction from developers in one month before release. If there is one year till release, it is nothing. But in one month we will have code slush, and after that — release, which should be supported

Re: r 293304: BROKEN: buildkernel fails due to error: error: no member named 't_maxopd' in 'struct tcpcb'

2016-01-07 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2016.01.07 06:43, David Wolfskill wrote: > The attached patch gets through the buildkernel. After install & reboot, > I'm not seeing obvious issues -- I can still talk to the box over TCP, at > least. This exact change was committed about an hour ago. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/ne

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-01 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly > broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL > shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date > before you upgrade and you're screwed

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-01 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: > sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in > business is > that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your > choice. > The custommers require it.. > You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Ameri

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-01 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for > many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't > been writing my own ports oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke > shit... (badly) ... There were ins

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-01 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.09.01 20:51, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> And for the portsnap users? >>> >> In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. >> > Sure about that? I'm sure of it. Your issue is with the tree itself, not the tool used to fetch it. > Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, i

Re: Modify bsdinstall to set the default locale?

2014-08-31 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.08.31 11:41, Allan Jude wrote: > That would seem to make sense. Where do these settings actually get > stored? Where would I find a list of the possible settings to create the > dialog? Setting them in /etc/login.conf for the default user class is how I do it. __

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

2014-08-08 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2014.08.08 17:41, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > What would be the better way to avoid this happening in the future? > Always update the bootloader before doing a zpool upgrade on your root pool. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Issues with Hyper-V network driver on ALPHA2/3

2013-09-28 Thread Andrew Berg
FreeBSD talkingzebra 10.0-ALPHA3 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA3 #0 r255918: Fri Sep 27 17:29:41 CDT 2013 toor@talkingzebra:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HYPERV amd64 Sometimes after a reboot, the interfaces get an IP (statically set), but there is no connectivity. Starting or restarting the netif service causes th

Re: 10.0-ALPHA2 Now Available

2013-09-18 Thread Andrew Berg
On 2013.09.18 14:36, Glen Barber wrote: > Changes between -ALPHA1 and -ALPHA2 include: > ... > o Import Hyper-V paravirtualized drivers from projects/hyperv > branch. These were merged in r255524 and are in -ALPHA1 (I am currently using them). Or has something changed with them? ___