Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

2010-02-28 Thread Aditya Sarawgi
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:51:34AM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:18:48AM +0000, Aditya Sarawgi wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:53:31PM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Now bwn(4) is available at the publ

Re: ssh port forwarding changed under 5-CURRENT vs. STABLE?

2003-11-09 Thread Aditya
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:01:58PM +, David Taylor wrote: > > > Is something else (e.g. another ssh session) already bound to that port? > > > > nope -- and I've tried all sorts of ports other than 8000 too: > > (I'm assuming you do have a lo0 device with 127.0.0.1) duh! that's exactly it, I

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2003-11-06 Thread Aditya
prodigy.net[207.115.63.108] said: 553 > 5.3.0 DNSBL:To request removal of,[62.80.122.197],send and E-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Content-Description: Undelivered Message > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:31:48 -0800 > From: Aditya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: ssh port forwarding changed under 5-CURRENT vs. STABLE?

2003-11-06 Thread Aditya
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:29:21PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:43:43PM -0800, Aditya wrote: > > > debug1: Connections to local port 8000 forwarded to remote address > > www.freebsd.org:80 > > debug1: Local forwarding listening on 127.0.0

ssh port forwarding changed under 5-CURRENT vs. STABLE?

2003-11-06 Thread Aditya
quest local forwarding. and I can't see any reason why the binding would fail: hilbert[ttyp1]:aditya~> sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedlow net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedlow: 0 hilbert[ttyp1]:aditya~> sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhi