Re: kern/43345: Support for the SiS 651 ATA controller

2003-02-12 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Soeren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems Aaron D. Gifford wrote: Then on one of the messages, I noticed a link to Patrick Bihan-Faou's problem report, read it, and tried out his patch under 5.0-CURRENT (having completed my install of 5.0-RELEASE and updated to -CURRENT).

Re: kern/43345: Support for the SiS 651 ATA controller

2003-02-12 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Hi, When I attempted to install FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE on a Shuttle SS51G box, just like some other users, I encountered the "ata0: READ command timeout" error during boot. I then tried 4.7-RELEASE and saw the same problem. A quick search of the FreeBSD mail archives turned up other users with

5.0-RC3 /etc/rc.d/ipfw natd start-up script bug -- was: 5.0-RC1/etc/rc.d/ipfw script and NAT

2003-01-13 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Is there any chance of getting the fix suggested in PR-47024 in 5.0 before release? Looks like a similar script bug with natd start-up was fixed in 4.x-STABLE back in Feb. of 2002 -- See the CVS logs for /etc/rc.network, in particular, cjc's log entries for revision 1.124 (MAIN) and revision 1

5.0-RC1 /etc/rc.d/ipfw script and NAT

2002-12-17 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Hi, There's trouble in the /etc/rc.d/ipfw script in how it changes things versus the 4.7 /etc/rc.network script when it comes to NAT in certain configurations. For example, on my home gateway box, rc.conf contains: # Network address translation: natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="" natd

Re: HELP: vinum and newfs on 5.0-RC1

2002-12-11 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Craig Boston wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:45, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: Let me correct this to state that the full volume name was "raid5volume" and I just shortened it to save typing. This turns out to be important. Looking at newfs.c, it looks like the last letter of the speci

Re: HELP: vinum and newfs on 5.0-RC1

2002-12-11 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
I wrote in my previous message: > ># newfs -O 2 -U /dev/vinum/raid5vol >newfs: /dev/vinum/raid5vol: 'e' partition is unavailable > ... >Here's my vinum setup: ... > volume raid5vol Let me correct this to state that the full volume name was "raid5volume" and I just shortened it to save typing.

HELP: vinum and newfs on 5.0-RC1

2002-12-09 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Okay, I had a vinum RAID5 set working on 4.7. Since I didn't have any data on it yet and saw today's announcement of 5.0-RC1, I thought I'd give 5.0-RC1 a try on the box in question. Vinum sees the RAID5 set I created just fine, so I decided to use newfs to create a UFS2 filesystem on the vo

Trying to get CURRENT

2000-02-07 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
Hello, For fun, this last weekend I decided to update from 3.4-STABLE to -CURRENT and try out some of the new features. I grabbed the sources (cvsup) and following the directions in UPDATING managed to build everything and install everything. Whew! I then compiled a new GENERIC kernel and rebo

make world dying

1999-01-19 Thread Aaron D. Gifford
I'm still trying to upgrade from 3.0-RELEASE to 3.0-CURRENT unsuccessfully. It used to die in perl, then that was fixed, but for the past 2 days, it has been dying in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386. Is this a known problem? Yes, I'm a CURRENT newbie, but hopefully only until the split to 3.1 whe