btw, has anyone tried to observe boot if you have like ~50 network interfaces?
it's all useful debug but it's wall of text? but i would not change default
i wouldn't change defaults for kernel too
and our kernel has actually structured output
this is not the case in eg linux kernel or even init
The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of
zeal, well-meaning but without understanding. -- Justice Louis D. Brandeis
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 10:58 AM Warner Losh wrote:
> Most systems have a pretty splash screen, but a very noisy actual text
> screen if you get t
Because they all follow the same concept. The startup text is useless in
that stage of the OS. If i need it for troubleshooting, dmesg can provide
it. IMHO, no text or no splash are irrelevant if they don't speed up the
boot process. Until we find a way to deal with this, it all boils down to
how t
Most systems have a pretty splash screen, but a very noisy actual text
screen if you get to it :) I'd be inclined to make that work if it has
broken (it used to work great).
Warner
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 11:10 AM Maku Bex wrote:
> Remember that quiet/silent != fast. You might as well ask for a
Am Sat, 1 Feb 2025 09:10:25 -0500
Dennis Clarke schrieb:
> >>
> >> The most useful thing to share right now would be the output of `zpool
> >> import` (with no pool name) on the rebooted system.
> >>
> >> That will show where the issues are, and suggest how they might be solved.
> >>
> >
> > H
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:19:11AM +, Steven Harms (High-Security Mail)
wrote:
S> I also realize that this is a probably a controversial perspective. My
motivation here is ultimately service to the FreeBSD Laptop project. Windows
and OSX have conditioned many in the population of the FreeBSD
Remember that quiet/silent != fast. You might as well ask for a "pretty"
splash screen instead of the dizzying text scroll.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025, 12:05 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:19:11AM +, Steven Harms (High-Security
> Mail) wrote:
> S> I also realize that this is a pr
On 08/12/2024 18:41, Warner Losh wrote:
Great! I'll take a look at that, as well as do the merge the typical
way (which only takes a few minutes now that I've bootstrapped
things). I'll compare the two to see what diffs there might be (to act
as a cross check for both methods). I'll then build
