Re: What's the newest C++ standard that we can target?

2025-01-08 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 8 Jan 2025, at 18:46, Alan Somers wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:44 AM Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> On 8 Jan 2025, at 18:31, Alan Somers wrote: >>> >>> What is the newest C++ standard that we can target in src, and be >>> confident that it will compile on all targets? Can we use C++2

Re: What's the newest C++ standard that we can target?

2025-01-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025, 10:47 AM Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:44 AM Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > On 8 Jan 2025, at 18:31, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > > What is the newest C++ standard that we can target in src, and be > > > confident that it will compile on all targets? Can we

Re: What's the newest C++ standard that we can target?

2025-01-08 Thread David Chisnall
On 8 Jan 2025, at 17:31, Alan Somers wrote: > > What is the newest C++ standard that we can target in src, and be > confident that it will compile on all targets? Can we use C++20? C++20 is pretty well supported by clang 13 (I’m using C++20 features on a project that needs to compile with clan

Re: What's the newest C++ standard that we can target?

2025-01-08 Thread Alan Somers
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:44 AM Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 8 Jan 2025, at 18:31, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > What is the newest C++ standard that we can target in src, and be > > confident that it will compile on all targets? Can we use C++20? > > C++17 is probably the safest one, as C++20 supp

Re: What's the newest C++ standard that we can target?

2025-01-08 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 8 Jan 2025, at 18:31, Alan Somers wrote: > > What is the newest C++ standard that we can target in src, and be > confident that it will compile on all targets? Can we use C++20? C++17 is probably the safest one, as C++20 support in libc++ 19 is mostly done, but not entirely complete: https:

#263542896 WIFI compiling error: Can anyone fix it on main branch?

2025-01-08 Thread Поддержка Мокка
​​Мы работаем над вашим запросом. Нам понадобилось чуть больше времени, чтобы решить ваш вопрос #263542896. Еще 24 часа, и мы постараемся к вам вернуться. Приносим извинения за неудобства. Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это письмо, так как оно сформировано автоматически. С уважением, служб