On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:29:46AM +0800, George Neville-Neil wrote:
G> > due to shortage of human resources and due to reservation of certain
hardware
G> > for the Christmas events, we won't be able to properly A/B test the
December
G> > snapshot at Netflix as we usually do. Given that testing
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:27 PM Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:19:26PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> > According to namei(9), namei should return a shared lock when
> > LOCKSHARED is specified. But in my experiments, it always seems to
> > return an exclusive lock instead. Fo
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:19:26PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> According to namei(9), namei should return a shared lock when
> LOCKSHARED is specified. But in my experiments, it always seems to
> return an exclusive lock instead. For example:
>
> $ cd /usr/tests/sys/fs/fusefs
> $ sudo dtrace -i
According to namei(9), namei should return a shared lock when
LOCKSHARED is specified. But in my experiments, it always seems to
return an exclusive lock instead. For example:
$ cd /usr/tests/sys/fs/fusefs
$ sudo dtrace -i 'fbt:fusefs:fuse_vnop_getattr:entry /pid==$target/
{printf("islocked=%#x"
