On 2024-06-12 00:47, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
The main symptom was that DNS was /really/ busted, which makes sense
when none of the DNS servers in the 1
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 12:16, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
> So this is simply a bug.
>
> I opened a code review request to fix this:
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45570
Thank you. An EN for 14.0 and 14.1 (as suggested in your review) is
certainly warranted.
As for the path forward, what do folks th
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:35:58 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
>
> Michael Gmelin writes:
>
> > @phk From which version did you upgrade?
>
> To be totally honest: I'm not entirely sure. Probably 13.x
>
@Bjoern I checked again, I'm pretty sure the problem was introduced in
https:
Michael Gmelin writes:
> @phk From which version did you upgrade?
To be totally honest: I'm not entirely sure. Probably 13.x
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:11:14 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:36:35 +
> >> "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:36:35 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes:
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the har
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:36:35 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes:
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
Did yo
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:36:35 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
>
> Bjoern A. Zeeb writes:
>
> > > I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
> > >
> > > ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
> > >
> > > I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
> >
> > Did you track it
Rodney W. Grimes writes:
> *Stomps off my soap box, hands phk a bandaid for the bite mark (always,
> always specify critical values even if they are the default), and
> retreats to the background*
/me hands Rod a glass of lemonade: "It's OK, you're welcome on my lawn :-)"
--
Poul-Henni
>
> Michael Gmelin writes:
>
> > You can do an interface route hack
>
> I think you misunderstand the situation.
>
> We are talking about people who have /etc/rc.conf files which relied
> on how default netmasks have worked for nearly three decades,
>
> Now that we have changed that de
Bjoern A. Zeeb writes:
> > I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
> >
> > ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
> >
> > I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
>
> Did you track it down to a specific change? I.e. is this
> ifconfig/netlink or the old kernel change fr
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
Did you track it down to a specific change? I.e. is this
ifconfig/netlink or the old kernel change from
Hi,
> On 12 Jun 2024, at 12:28, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Defaulting to a /8 netmask for 192.168.x.y does not make *any* sense ever.
+1
--
Bob Bishop
r...@gid.co.uk
Van: Poul-Henning Kamp
Datum: woensdag, 12 juni 2024 12:39
Aan: Ronald Klop
CC: curr...@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: 14.1-R rc.conf/ifconfig netmask issue was really hard to figure
out
Ronald Klop writes:
> What do you thing about defaulting to /32 on a missing netmask?
> An interface with 1 I
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 11:28:38 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
>
> Michael Gmelin writes:
>
> > You can do an interface route hack
>
> I think you misunderstand the situation.
I completely understand the situation and I can feel your pain, I just
wanted to throw in how to reach th
Michael Gmelin writes:
> You can do an interface route hack
I think you misunderstand the situation.
We are talking about people who have /etc/rc.conf files which relied
on how default netmasks have worked for nearly three decades,
Now that we have changed that default, many of them wi
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:39:36 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> Ronald Klop writes:
>
> > What do you thing about defaulting to /32 on a missing netmask?
> > An interface with 1 IP address without any information about the
> > network All traffic can go to the gateway.
>
> I dont think tha
Ronald Klop writes:
> What do you thing about defaulting to /32 on a missing netmask?
> An interface with 1 IP address without any information about the network All
> traffic can go to the gateway.
I dont think that will work ?
The gateway will not be inside any of the attached networks, so you
Van: Poul-Henning Kamp
Datum: woensdag, 12 juni 2024 09:47
Aan: curr...@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: 14.1-R rc.conf/ifconfig netmask issue was really hard to figure out
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the hard way, that this defaults to
I had a machine with this line in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_bla0="192.168.87.11"
I found out the hard way, that this defaults to /8 now.
The main symptom was that DNS was /really/ busted, which makes sense
when none of the DNS servers in the 192/8 "swamp" can be reached.
Since we all know
20 matches
Mail list logo
