On 3/12/24 15:41, Alan Somers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:28 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
.
.
.
.
Yes, this looks exactly like an ordering problem. zpools get imported
early in the boot process, under the assumption that most of them are
local. Networking comes up later, under the assumption
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:28 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>
> This is a somewhat odd problem and may have nothing to do with iSCSI
> config at all. Suffice it to say that I have the following in the server
> /etc/rc.conf :
>
> #
> # the iSCSI initiator
> iscsid_enable="YES"
> iscsictl_enable="YES"
>
This is a somewhat odd problem and may have nothing to do with iSCSI
config at all. Suffice it to say that I have the following in the server
/etc/rc.conf :
#
# the iSCSI initiator
iscsid_enable="YES"
iscsictl_enable="YES"
iscsictl_flags="-Aa"
#
During boot I see this on the console :
can
> On 12. Mar 2024, at 14:39, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious about tcp RACK.
>
> As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for
> poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, will
> I see any difference using RACK?
> What tests should I
On 3/12/24 6:39 AM, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious about tcp RACK.
As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for
poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, will
I see any difference using RACK?
What tests should I do for comparison?
I
Hello,
I'm curious about tcp RACK.
As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for
poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, will
I see any difference using RACK?
What tests should I do for comparison?
Thanks,
escreveu (quinta, 16/11/2023 à(s) 15:10)
