Re: 13 stable build fail

2021-07-02 Thread Mark Linimon
Is this the same as: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256947 ? mcl

13 stable build fail

2021-07-02 Thread Rozhuk Ivan
... In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/fstab.c:38: In file included from /tmp/obj.world/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/include/sys/mount.h:38: /tmp/obj.world/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/include/sys/ucred.h:42:10: fatal error: 'bsm/audit.h' file not found #include ^ 1

Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot

2021-07-02 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Jul-2, at 08:38, Chuck Tuffli wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:50 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-current > wrote: >> >> I've given up on figuring any useful out for this example. >> I've also not had a repeat so far. >> >> I'm progressing to much more recent commits for the >> envir

Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot

2021-07-02 Thread Chuck Tuffli
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:50 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: > > I've given up on figuring any useful out for this example. > I've also not had a repeat so far. > > I'm progressing to much more recent commits for the > environment to be based on as well. > > The primary aarch64 system

Re: Changes to backtrace() ??

2021-07-02 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021, 4:35 AM Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current < freebsd-current@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2-7-2021 12:17, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 11:52:14AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen via > freebsd-current wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Have there been changes in the ba

Re: Changes to backtrace() ??

2021-07-02 Thread Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current
On 2-7-2021 12:17, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 11:52:14AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current wrote: Hi, Have there been changes in the backtrace() calls? I recently upgraded my current server, and now the Ceph backtrace test starts to fail It looks like it i

Re: Changes to backtrace() ??

2021-07-02 Thread Tobias Kortkamp
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 11:52:14AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current wrote: > Hi, > > Have there been changes in the backtrace() calls? > I recently upgraded my current server, and now the Ceph backtrace test > starts to fail > > It looks like it is implemented in the llvm code.

Changes to backtrace() ??

2021-07-02 Thread Willem Jan Withagen via freebsd-current
Hi, Have there been changes in the backtrace() calls? I recently upgraded my current server, and now the Ceph backtrace test starts to fail It looks like it is implemented in the llvm code. So it could be that something is off in that code. --WjW Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Seg

etcupdate: Failed to build new tree

2021-07-02 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, Last update I have some issues with etcupdate: etcupdate warning: "No previous tree to compare against, a sane comparison is not possible." That I corrected with: etcupdate extract etcupdate diff > /tmp/etc.diff patch -R < /tmp/etc.diff (etcupdate diff doesn't show any diffs.) Today I'v