On 2018-Jul-24, at 10:32 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc/6597/consoleText
> (head -r336573 after the prior 6596's -r336565 ):
>
> --- all_subdir_lib/ofed ---
> In file included from /workspace/src/contrib/ofed/librdmacm/cma.h:43:0,
> fr
https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc/6597/consoleText
(head -r336573 after the prior 6596's -r336565 ):
--- all_subdir_lib/ofed ---
In file included from /workspace/src/contrib/ofed/librdmacm/cma.h:43:0,
from /workspace/src/contrib/ofed/librdmacm/acm.c:42:
/workspace/
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 06:28:41 +0200, Kevin Oberman
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 18:54 -0700, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes, first you press m. Then you will see diff
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:28:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 18:54 -0700, bob prohaska wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, first you press m.
In message <20180724181703.gk65...@kib.kiev.ua>, Konstantin Belousov
writes:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:43:55PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> > I recently merged my work in progress tree up to r336665 and built a
> > i386 VM image. Running the image in QEMU (qemu-system-x86_64) and
> > executing 'top
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:43:55PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> I recently merged my work in progress tree up to r336665 and built a
> i386 VM image. Running the image in QEMU (qemu-system-x86_64) and
> executing 'top' I see the WCPU column reported as either nan% or inf%
> for all processes.
>
> Prio
I recently merged my work in progress tree up to r336665 and built a
i386 VM image. Running the image in QEMU (qemu-system-x86_64) and
executing 'top' I see the WCPU column reported as either nan% or inf%
for all processes.
Prior to today I hadn't built or tested i386 in a while, so I am not
sure
On 22/7/18 4:32 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 21 Jul 2018, at 21:11, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Yuri Pankov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
...
anyone know if there is a clang equivalent of -Wp, -E,-lang-asm?
In later GCC versions the cpp's -lang-asm seems to be deprecated in
favor of -x assembler-wit
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 02:20:00 -0400
Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2018-07-13 07:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > The problem is some kind of weird. I face UEFI boot problems on GPT drives
> > where the first partition begins at block 40 of the hdd/ssd.
> >
> > I have two host in private use based on an
> > ou
> On 24 Jul 2018, at 09:20, Allan Jude wrote:
>
> On 2018-07-13 07:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> The problem is some kind of weird. I face UEFI boot problems on GPT drives
>> where the first partition begins at block 40 of the hdd/ssd.
>>
>> I have two host in private use based on an
>> outdated
10 matches
Mail list logo