Re: drm-next-kmod regression

2018-03-02 Thread Manuel Stühn
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:24:55AM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: Manuel Stühn writes: Hi, the last drm-next-kmod worked fine on my Lenovo T420 with i5-2520M and a HD Graphics 3000. After the update to the actual version (4.11) from ports, I'm seeing regression in form of a very slow xfce4-desktop. T

Fwd: drm-next-kmod-4.11 and vaapi hardware acceleration

2018-03-02 Thread Oleg Lelchuk
-- Forwarded message -- From: Oleg Lelchuk Date: Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:12 AM Subject: Re: drm-next-kmod-4.11 and vaapi hardware acceleration To: Jan Beich Well, hopefully, this regression will be fixed soon. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Jan Beich wrote: > Oleg Lelchuk wr

Re: drm-next-kmod regression

2018-03-02 Thread Jan Beich
Manuel Stühn writes: > Hi, > the last drm-next-kmod worked fine on my Lenovo T420 with i5-2520M and > a HD Graphics 3000. After the update to the actual version (4.11) from > ports, I'm seeing regression in form of a very slow xfce4-desktop. The > slowness starts after some short time. Slow means

Re: drm-next-kmod-4.11 and vaapi hardware acceleration

2018-03-02 Thread Jan Beich
Oleg Lelchuk writes: > I run 12-CURRENT-r330303. My cpu is Haswell. After compiling > drm-next-kmod-4.11 and libva-intel-driver, I get garbled videos in both mpv > and vlc when the vaapi hardware acceleration is enabled. I had no such > problem with the previous version of drm-next-kmod. Is it po

unable to build head - iconv issues

2018-03-02 Thread Eitan Adler
uname -a: FreeBSD develop 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r329949: Sat Feb 24 07:58:23 UTC 2018 eax@fasteagle:/srv/obj/fbsd/head/srv/src/fbsd/head/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 src-env.conf: MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/srv/obj src.conf: MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes WITHOUT_SVNLITE=true version: head:330

drm-next-kmod-4.11 and vaapi hardware acceleration

2018-03-02 Thread Oleg Lelchuk
I run 12-CURRENT-r330303. My cpu is Haswell. After compiling drm-next-kmod-4.11 and libva-intel-driver, I get garbled videos in both mpv and vlc when the vaapi hardware acceleration is enabled. I had no such problem with the previous version of drm-next-kmod. Is it possible that libva-intel-driver-

Re: drm-next-kmod regression

2018-03-02 Thread Manuel Stühn
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:52:14PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 03/02/18 17:40, Manuel Stühn wrote: Hi, the last drm-next-kmod worked fine on my Lenovo T420 with i5-2520M and a HD Graphics 3000. After the update to the actual version (4.11) from ports, I'm seeing regression in form of a

Re: drm-next-kmod regression

2018-03-02 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 03/02/18 17:40, Manuel Stühn wrote: Hi, the last drm-next-kmod worked fine on my Lenovo T420 with i5-2520M and a HD Graphics 3000. After the update to the actual version (4.11) from ports, I'm seeing regression in form of a very slow xfce4-desktop. The slowness starts after some short time.

Re: pkg does not recognize correct kernel version

2018-03-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 02:02:58 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:32:43PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 09:45:47 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:57:53AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, Febru

drm-next-kmod regression

2018-03-02 Thread Manuel Stühn
Hi, the last drm-next-kmod worked fine on my Lenovo T420 with i5-2520M and a HD Graphics 3000. After the update to the actual version (4.11) from ports, I'm seeing regression in form of a very slow xfce4-desktop. The slowness starts after some short time. Slow means for example that I can type

Re: Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Renato Botelho
On 02/03/18 12:55, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: >> On 02/03/18 12:31, Kyle Evans wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: Kyle, I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only odd thing

Re: Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Kyle Evans
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: > On 02/03/18 12:31, Kyle Evans wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: >>> Kyle, >>> >>> I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only >>> odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you

Re: Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Renato Botelho
On 02/03/18 12:31, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: >> Kyle, >> >> I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only >> odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you can see at [1]. >> >> My laptop is running a recent current (

Re: Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Kyle Evans
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: > Kyle, > > I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only > odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you can see at [1]. > > My laptop is running a recent current (r330275) with ZFS and UEFI. > > [1] https://i

Re: Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Ed Maste
On 2 March 2018 at 07:06, Renato Botelho wrote: > Kyle, > > I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only > odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you can see at [1]. Hi Renato, thanks for testing! Are you booting via BIOS or UEFI?

Possible race in buildworld, @r330236 -> @r330274

2018-03-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On the two machines where I track head daily, I had failures during "make buildworld" ... in different places on the two machines; re-trying the build succeeded (in each case). Lately, I have (also) been tracking head on these machines with /etc/src.conf augmented with: # For Lua loader experimen

Question mark on Lua menu box

2018-03-02 Thread Renato Botelho
Kyle, I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you can see at [1]. My laptop is running a recent current (r330275) with ZFS and UEFI. [1] https://imgur.com/a/kIQ0O -- Renato Botelho signature.asc Description: Op

Conflict between FreeBSD-binutils and FreeBSD-lld packages

2018-03-02 Thread Tobias Kortkamp
Building pkgbase packages with r330236 results in FreeBSD-binutils and FreeBSD-lld packages conflicting with each other. Both want to install /usr/share/man/man1/ld.1.gz For now I'm working around it by manually extracting FreeBSD-lld. FreeBSD-binutils should install its man page as ld.bfd.1.gz i