Re: How to find CPU microcode version ?

2018-02-20 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > One situation that can cause out of swap errors is large amounts of > > wired ram. > > Indeed: Very large amounts of wired RAM. What happened ? This > did not happen before the last upgrade ? I'm at r328899. vfs.zfs.arc_max was at 32345493504 changed that to vfs.zfs.arc_max=16172746752

Re: How to find CPU microcode version ?

2018-02-20 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > One situation that can cause out of swap errors is large amounts of > wired ram. Indeed: Very large amounts of wired RAM. What happened ? This did not happen before the last upgrade ? I'm at r328899. CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.9% idle Mem: 2472K Active,

A small procedural request

2018-02-20 Thread Julian Elischer
Hi,  I have a very small request to those committing into head. If you commit a fix, then if it is possible to easily do so, can you give the revision number in which the regression was introduced? like "this was  broken in r329xxx" this allows people who are looking for specific problems to

Re: GELI with UEFI supporting Boot Environments goes to HEAD when?

2018-02-20 Thread Tommi Pernila
Hi Eric, could you provide a brief update how the work is going? Br, Tommi On Nov 16, 2017 04:29, "Eric McCorkle" wrote: Right, so basically, the remaining GELI patches are against loader, and most of them can go in independently of the work on removing boot1. There's a unanimous consensus

Re: kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d

2018-02-20 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:39:53 +0100 said On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:18:15 -0800 "Chris H" wrote: > I'm seeing a number of messages like the following: > kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d > > and was wondering if it's anything to be concerned with, or whether > fsck(8) is fi

Re: ACPI panic on boot with new Lua loader and other minor issues

2018-02-20 Thread Kyle Evans
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: > [... snip ...] > > Moreover, the "boot [kernel]" loader command does not work: > > OK ls /boot/kernel.old/kernel > /boot/kernel.old/kernel > OK boot kernel.old > Command failed > OK boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel > Command failed

Re: amd64 head -r329465 (non-debug build, but with symbols): "panic: spin lock held too long" during make check-old, reported during a sys_vfork

2018-02-20 Thread Mateusz Guzik
Committed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=329660 thanks for reporting On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > I missed a consumer, try this: > > diff --git a/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c b/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c > index 5e8928cb1534..174fffc5c666 100644 > -

Re: pkg does not recognize correct kernel version

2018-02-20 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 22:05:51 +0100, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > >> Look at the man page. pkg reads version from the /bin/sh ELF FreeBSD > > > Which man page? I can't find it in pkg help update or pkg help upgrade or > man pkg. I had to di

Re: amd64 head -r329465 (non-debug build, but with symbols): "panic: spin lock held too long" during make check-old, reported during a sys_vfork

2018-02-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:50:57PM +0100, Juan Ram?n Molina Menor wrote: > > I committed the fix in > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=329542 > > > > i.e. should be stable from this point on. > > Hi! > > It is maybe unrelated, but recent commits have broken my system with

Re: amd64 head -r329465 (non-debug build, but with symbols): "panic: spin lock held too long" during make check-old, reported during a sys_vfork

2018-02-20 Thread Mateusz Guzik
I missed a consumer, try this: diff --git a/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c b/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c index 5e8928cb1534..174fffc5c666 100644 --- a/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c +++ b/sys/kern/sys_procdesc.c @@ -398,7 +398,6 @@ procdesc_close(struct file *fp, struct thread *td) * proces

Re: amd64 head -r329465 (non-debug build, but with symbols): "panic: spin lock held too long" during make check-old, reported during a sys_vfork

2018-02-20 Thread Juan Ramón Molina Menor
I committed the fix in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=329542 i.e. should be stable from this point on. Hi! It is maybe unrelated, but recent commits have broken my system with a similar error. I did not have panics with a system built around December, but since updati

Re: ACPI panic on boot with new Lua loader and other minor issues

2018-02-20 Thread Juan Ramón Molina Menor
Le 19/02/2018 à 21:21, Kyle Evans a écrit :> Hello! On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: I have done a full build of r329555 to test the new Lua boot loader. Both the new and the old kernels panic after being loaded with: panic: running without device atpic require

Re: Recent world+kernel has broken Linux 3D apps?

2018-02-20 Thread Johannes Lundberg
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 02/20/18 14:03, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky >> wrote: >> >> On 02/20/18 12:39, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >>> >>> Before rebuilding world my system was running Linux games fine

Re: Recent world+kernel has broken Linux 3D apps?

2018-02-20 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 02/20/18 14:03, Johannes Lundberg wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 02/20/18 12:39, Johannes Lundberg wrote: Before rebuilding world my system was running Linux games fine with a couple of months old world/kernel and drm-next-kmod. Since updating worl

Re: Recent world+kernel has broken Linux 3D apps?

2018-02-20 Thread Johannes Lundberg
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 02/20/18 12:39, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > >> Before rebuilding world my system was running Linux games fine with a >> couple of months old world/kernel and drm-next-kmod. >> >> Since updating world+kernel last week all Linux 3D ap

Re: Recent world+kernel has broken Linux 3D apps?

2018-02-20 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 02/20/18 12:39, Johannes Lundberg wrote: Before rebuilding world my system was running Linux games fine with a couple of months old world/kernel and drm-next-kmod. Since updating world+kernel last week all Linux 3D apps fail (native binaries like glxgears and supertuxkart works fine). linux-

Recent world+kernel has broken Linux 3D apps?

2018-02-20 Thread Johannes Lundberg
Before rebuilding world my system was running Linux games fine with a couple of months old world/kernel and drm-next-kmod. Since updating world+kernel last week all Linux 3D apps fail (native binaries like glxgears and supertuxkart works fine). linux-c6/c7, intel/modesetting, does no difference T

Re: kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d

2018-02-20 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:18:15 -0800 "Chris H" wrote: > I'm seeing a number of messages like the following: > kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d > > and was wondering if it's anything to be concerned with, or whether > fsck(8) is fixing them. > This began to happen when the po

Re: pkg does not recognize correct kernel version

2018-02-20 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 23:38+0100, Ronald Klop wrote: > Does this mean I always have to do a *clean* buildworld after every version > bump? This takes ages. Yes, I've come to the conclusion that whenever __FreeBSD_version in sys/sys/param.h is incremented, then it's time to blow away /usr/obj, rec

[panic][bhyve] mtx_lock_spin: recursed on non-recursive mutex vcpu lock @ /usr/src/sys/amd64/vmm/vmm.c:2246

2018-02-20 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
# info - 100% reproducible on starting a bhyve-based vm - recent current r329611, also panics at r329531 - GENERIC + WITH_CTF=1 and DEBUG=-g - built WITH_META_MODE=yes & CCACHE_BUILD=yes # panic dmesg [36984] panic: mtx_lock_spin: recursed on non-recursive mutex vcpu lock @ /usr/src/sys/amd64/v