On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Jim Erickson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2018, at 21:52, Jim Erickson wrote:
>>>
>>> been getting this for a few days now.
>> [...]
>>> In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/gdtoa/machdep_ldisx.c:45:
>>> In file
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2018, at 21:52, Jim Erickson wrote:
>>
>> been getting this for a few days now.
> [...]
>> In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/gdtoa/machdep_ldisx.c:45:
>> In file included from /usr/src/contrib/gdtoa/gdtoaimp.h:197:
>> /usr/s
On 30 Jan 2018, at 21:52, Jim Erickson wrote:
>
> been getting this for a few days now.
[...]
> In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/gdtoa/machdep_ldisx.c:45:
> In file included from /usr/src/contrib/gdtoa/gdtoaimp.h:197:
> /usr/src/include/stdlib.h:95:7: error: expected function body after
>
been getting this for a few days now.
echo libc.so.7:
/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libcompiler_rt.a
/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libssp_nonshared.a >> .depend
/usr/local/bin/ccache clang -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
-I/usr/src/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64
Hello list,
NeoSmart Technologies has been using these patches to address issues in
production for live CDs that are used by end users on their own (generic)
hardware. We've validated the patches against well over 50k i686 machines,
(not fleet machines, each is more or less unique/random), running
On 30.01.2018 7:05, Shane Ambler wrote:
> You may also (soon) need WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD, there are plans to enable
> LLD by default.
I think, WITHOUT_LLD should be enough, together with WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP.
> Looking at man src.conf on current,
>
> WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER enforces -
> WITHOUT_B
