On 2017-May-9, at 2:00 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
. . .
> fatal kernel trap:
> exception = 0x903a64e (unknown)
> srr0= 0x7ff760
> srr1= 0xc1007c
> lr = 0x907f
> curthread = 0x147d6c0
> pid = 11, comm = idle: cpu0
> [ thread pid 11
Hi,
I've been chasing a NDIS wireless bug for a while as I realized network stopped
working on some of hardware.
I have its PR and also attached a patch.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213237
It will be nice if someone can follow up so that we can have 11.1-RELEASE NDIS
wi
% which cpp
/usr/bin/cpp
troutmask:kargl[408] cpp --version
FreeBSD clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final 297347) (based on LLVM
4.0.0)
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
troutmask:kargl[409] cpp --help |grep trad
-traditional-cppEnable so
On 05/19/17 17:34, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 17 May 2017 at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778
Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many
On 17 May 2017 at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778
>>>
>>
>> Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many areas may be improved using
On 2017-05-19 00:01, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> So after stripping out the HPN version of ssh from our product becasue
>> "it was no longer needed" we dicovered that we were premature in doing so.
>> Apparently ssh still really needs HPN to get any throughput at all when
>> there are latencies invo
Hi,
If you are using webcamd, please help test the latest version which
includes the most recent Linux v4.12-rc1 media tree sources.
The latest webcamd port is available from here:
svn --username anonsvn --password anonsvn \
checkout svn://svn.turbocat.net/i4b/trunk/ports/multimedia/webc
> So after stripping out the HPN version of ssh from our product becasue
> "it was no longer needed" we dicovered that we were premature in doing so.
> Apparently ssh still really needs HPN to get any throughput at all when
> there are latencies involved.
>
>
> For example, with HPN we get 13MB/s
