Just upgraded again to r296709. Running for about an hour, performance
appears to be restored. Will report back if this changes.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Ultima wrote:
> Hmm, the total cost would be hard to calculate, not all of it was
> purchased at the same time.
>
> CPU - ( E5-2670v3
Should I restart and provide this info after 20min into build? Or is this
good info?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ultima wrote:
> last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23
> 18:52:47
> 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping
> CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.
last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23
18:52:47
169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping
CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.1% system, 0.1% interrupt, 60.3% idle
Mem: 12G Active, 43G Inact, 186G Wired, 8867M Free
ARC: 166G Total, 122G MFU, 38G MRU, 46M Anon, 753M He
On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. This
> system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many
> jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After the
> upgrade, it is rare t
Hello,
Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. This
system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many
jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After the
upgrade, it is rare to see over 100 pkg per hour built. Possible reg
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #2570 - Fixed:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2570/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2570/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2570/console
Change summaries:
296
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #2569 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2569/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2569/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2569/console
Change summari
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:01:34PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> >>> On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa
WITH_FAST_DEPEND is now enabled by default for in-tree and out-of-tree
builds. It no longer runs mkdep(1) during 'make depend', and the
'make depend' stage can safely be skipped now as it is auto ran
when building 'make all' and will generate all SRCS and DPSRCS before
building anything else. Dep
On 3/11/2016 9:10 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> WITH_FAST_DEPEND is now enabled by default for in-tree and out-of-tree
> builds. It no longer runs mkdep(1) during 'make depend', and the
> 'make depend' stage can safely be skipped now as it is auto ran
> when building 'make all' and will generate all
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #2568 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2568/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2568/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2568/console
Change summari
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visua
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 15:51:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:39:08PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
recompile whole system and reinstall on all machines instead of just
I am proposed: patch packages (replaced or removed some files).
some small package. It has it's impact
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #2567 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2567/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2567/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2567/console
Change summari
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:39:08PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >> Anything else is on your side and even if I understand your complaints
> >> (and I agree with some of them) I don't thing it will change anything on
> >> the future of packaged base.
> >> So it is better to spend our time on wo
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 15:05:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
[...]
Case of only a few monolitic packa
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> > > > On 8
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> > > On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > In terms o
FreeBSD_HEAD_i386 - Build #2566 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2566/
Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2566/changes
Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/2566/console
Change summari
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> > On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > >
> >
> > In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visually then you are
> > likely to ha
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #1122 - Still Failing:
Build information:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/1122/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/1122/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_
Its also worth pointing that if you decouple the userland from the kernel
files you no longer have a boot environment, as all the basic stuff to boot
the os isn't contained within the bootfs. I'm still struggling to see why
/boot needs to be on a different dataset, its just a bit of a linuxism.
On
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
>
> In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visually then you are
> likely to have problems anyway, unless your eyes and brain work far better
> than most human
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, krad wrote:
> Its also worth pointing that if you decouple the userland from the kernel
> files you no longer have a boot environment, as all the basic stuff to boot
> the os isn't contained within the bootfs. I'm still struggling to see why
> /boot needs to be on
26 matches
Mail list logo
