Re: Haswell CPU Feature

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Neel Natu wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > I'm thinking something like this: > > > > Index: sys/x86/x86/identcpu.c > > === > > - --- sys/x86/x86/identcpu.c

Re: Haswell CPU Feature

Hi Sean, On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 01/05/15 17:50, Andrey Fesenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Sean Bruno >> wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> On 01/05/15 16:57, Neel

Re: Haswell CPU Feature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/05/15 17:50, Andrey Fesenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Sean Bruno > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 01/05/15 16:57, Neel Natu wrote: >>> Congratulations, you have the ability to debug the Haswe

Re: Haswell CPU Feature

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 01/05/15 16:57, Neel Natu wrote: >> Congratulations, you have the ability to debug the Haswell silicon >> > HA! > > Is this turned on purposefully (its a feature of the CPU) or is this > tu

Re: Haswell CPU Feature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/05/15 16:57, Neel Natu wrote: > Congratulations, you have the ability to debug the Haswell silicon > HA! Is this turned on purposefully (its a feature of the CPU) or is this turned on unintentionally and is a bug in manufacturing? sean -

Re: Haswell CPU Feature

Hi Sean, On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > "\014" > > > I don't know what this cpu feature2 flag means, but my x240 haswell > laptop has a "b11" feature2 set. > > sean > > dmesg | grep -i features > > Features=0xbfebfbff

Haswell CPU Feature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 "\014" I don't know what this cpu feature2 flag means, but my x240 haswell laptop has a "b11" feature2 set. sean dmesg | grep -i features Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x7ffafbbf,FMA,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,TS

Re: vt and VirtualBox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/05/2015 12:33, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 01/05/2015 12:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> On 05.01.2015 20:11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >>> Someone with copious free time and enough knowledge should be >>> able to port Linux KMS/DRM2 driver for us. > >

false alarm (Re: invalid checksum with vtnet and in_kernel BOOTP)

for the records, this was not a problem with vtnet but a bug in some bhyve modifications of ours. Thanks to Bryan who pointed out the potential location of the problem. cheers luigi On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > I am trying to run a diskless bhyve client diskless

Re: vt and VirtualBox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/05/2015 12:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 05.01.2015 20:11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> Someone with copious free time and enough knowledge should be >> able to port Linux KMS/DRM2 driver for us. > >> https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trun

Re: vt and VirtualBox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.01.2015 20:11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Someone with copious free time and enough knowledge should be able > to port Linux KMS/DRM2 driver for us. > > https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Additions/linux > > It shouldn't be too

Re: vt and VirtualBox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/05/2015 07:56, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Is here any possibility to add "virtualbox" driver to vt? Now > console of -CURRENT guest in VirtualBox (using "vga" driver) is > almost unusable slow! Sorry, we do not have KMS for VirtualBox guest y

Re: [RFC] Start SMP subsystem earlier

On 5 January 2015 at 06:08, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/05/15 14:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:18:17PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is a limitiation on the number of interrupt vectors available when >>> only a single processor

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #520

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [RFC] Start SMP subsystem earlier

On 01/05/15 14:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:18:17PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, There is a limitiation on the number of interrupt vectors available when only a single processor is running. To have more interrupts available we need to start SMP earlier when

Re: [RFC] Start SMP subsystem earlier

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:18:17PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > There is a limitiation on the number of interrupt vectors available when > only a single processor is running. To have more interrupts available we > need to start SMP earlier when building a monotolith kernel and not

[RFC] Start SMP subsystem earlier

Hi, There is a limitiation on the number of interrupt vectors available when only a single processor is running. To have more interrupts available we need to start SMP earlier when building a monotolith kernel and not loading drivers as modules. The driver in question is a network driver and

vt and VirtualBox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Is here any possibility to add "virtualbox" driver to vt? Now console of -CURRENT guest in VirtualBox (using "vga" driver) is almost unusable slow! I'm not sure, that VirtualBox has API for paravirtualized screen output, though (guest addons?).

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2 #519

See ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"