clang+libc++ using missing powl

2013-09-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I'm running exp-run to build the whole ports tree with clang using libc++ by default. As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: undefined reference to `powl' It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet in libm, am I missing something? regards, Bap

Re: I386 jail on amd64 CURRENT core dump in libc?

2013-09-04 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:14:03AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:25:29PM +0300, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote: > > KB> > > KB> Your installed libraries do not have proper debugging symbols. > > KB> Since the issue seems to be in the compat32 layer, you may try to start

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-09-04 Thread Justin Hibbits
Wow, not sure how this skipped by me. Will fix this evening. -Justin On Sep 4, 2013 1:33 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: > TB --- 2013-09-04 17:40:07 - tinderbox 2.10 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2013-09-04 17:40:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca8.3-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote: On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the porting work?

Cant build 32bit libraries

2013-09-04 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hello, I'm trying to install 32 libraries or a resent snapshot, but i get this error. /usr/src # make build32 ... ===> kerberos5/liblibheimipcc (installincludes) ===> kerberos5/liblibheimipcs (installincludes) cd /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/lib; MACHINE=i386 MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE_CPU="i686 mmx

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-09-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-09-04 17:40:07 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-09-04 17:40:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: i915kms.ko not loading

2013-09-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 2:16:35 pm Alexander wrote: > 04.09.2013 18:58, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 11:01:03 am Alexander wrote: > >> 02.09.2013 14:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron пишет: > >>> On 02.09.2013 12:00, Alexander wrote: > (...) > #17 0x80

Re: i915kms.ko not loading

2013-09-04 Thread Alexander
04.09.2013 18:58, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 11:01:03 am Alexander wrote: >> 02.09.2013 14:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron пишет: >>> On 02.09.2013 12:00, Alexander wrote: (...) #17 0x80462700 in sysctl_move_oid () #18 0x80319070 in drm_attach ()

Re: i915kms.ko not loading

2013-09-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 11:01:03 am Alexander wrote: > 02.09.2013 14:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron пишет: > > On 02.09.2013 12:00, Alexander wrote: > >> (...) > >> #17 0x80462700 in sysctl_move_oid () > >> #18 0x80319070 in drm_attach () > >> (...) > > The kernel is missing deb

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> - HP EliteBook 8460p (amd64: r255188) with DVD replaced by a second >> hardrive (where fbsd is installed): It crash just after the message >> "GEOM: new disk ada1" during boot >> >> screenshot of the crash screen: >> http://goo.gl/tW1VIx

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the > >> porting work? > >> -Nathan > > #define GET_

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote: On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the porting work? -Nathan #define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used) GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total amo

Re: i915kms.ko not loading

2013-09-04 Thread Alexander
02.09.2013 14:42, Jean-Sébastien Pédron пишет: > On 02.09.2013 12:00, Alexander wrote: >> (...) >> #17 0x80462700 in sysctl_move_oid () >> #18 0x80319070 in drm_attach () >> (...) > The kernel is missing debug symbols. Could you please rebuild your > kernel with the following option

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 04.09.2013 15:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote: On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if theres positive input i have a z

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the > porting work? > -Nathan #define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used) GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total amount of stack space available to th

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote: On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to he

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 04.09.2013 11:20, Johan Hendriks wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch against present hea

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-09-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-09-04 05:29:23 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-09-04 05:29:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Johan Hendriks
Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch against present head (r255131) can be found here: http

Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking

2013-09-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to help further it. Just checking to see how widel