Hi,
jkim - is there any negative side-effect from reverting r231797 ? Did
this fix a bug you saw on another platform?
I have the same symptom on my T400, unfortunately it's in the office
and I can't get to it right now to test.
Thanks,
Adrian
___
fr
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:14:10 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 3 December 2012 10:41, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > While not commenting on the correctness of the current contents,
> > the userland PPP section of the FAQ appears to mostly deal with
> > dialup modems. I suspect more people use it now
On Dec 15, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>
> Ok, scrap that, I have too many copies of the conversion lying around
> and got confused.
>
> I'd like to thank all who reported in with hashes of their conversion
> run and will make sure all is solid tomorrow.
>
Thanks. I am wondering
For those on -stable@ and -current@ not subscribed to -announce@:
Glen
- Forwarded message from Glen Barber -
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:37:11 -0500
From: Glen Barber
To: freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Development Snapshot Availability
I am pleased to announce the re-avai
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 22:07:46 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 16:10:46 +, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 15 December 2012 13:22, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > > Bad news everyone,
> > >
> > > tl;dr The git mirror of the source repository needs to be re-rolled to
> > > make the co
On 15.12.2012 23:03, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 15.12.2012 22:50, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mark Johnston
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
final testing,
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 16:10:46 +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 15 December 2012 13:22, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > Bad news everyone,
> >
> > tl;dr The git mirror of the source repository needs to be re-rolled to
> > make the conversion deterministically repeatable, this will change
> > pretty much a
On 15.12.2012 22:50, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated p
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
>> final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated patch for
>> HEAD, that include
On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
>> final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated patch for
>> HEAD, that includes
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
> final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated patch for
> HEAD, that includes several new changes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/call
Hi,
The output is in line with the 802.11n specification, which calls all
of this stuff "HT".
I'll work with Eadler and others to improve the wireless documentation
and FAQ and I'll make sure there's a chapter on "802.11n", which
explains what HT (high throughput) is.
802.11ac is adding "VHT" (v
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please test with MIPS? David has a MIPS board now.
>
Quoting from my first mail -- "We tested the code on amd64, MIPS and arm."
I used the board you gave to me. I run only some "basic" tests, but I
can look forward running so
Hi,
Can you please test with MIPS? David has a MIPS board now.
Can you also test that various performance tests haven't been
affected? Eg, do iperf tests through that MIPS board, configured up as
an AP.
Please test with a bunch of disk IO activity too.
I know this is a lot to ask for, but I'd h
Hi.
I'm sorry to interrupt review, but as usual good ideas came during the
final testing, causing another round. :) Here is updated patch for
HEAD, that includes several new changes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/calloutng_12_15.patch
The new changes are:
-- Precision and event aggregation
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:03:42AM -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
>
> > Adrian
> >
> > On 12 December 2012 17:39, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Adrian Chadd
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The AR9285 is a 2GHz only NIC.
> >>>
> >>> The channel list shows 11b, 11bg, HT20 an
On 15 December 2012 13:22, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Bad news everyone,
>
> tl;dr The git mirror of the source repository needs to be re-rolled to
> make the conversion deterministically repeatable, this will change
> pretty much all git commit hashes.
>
> The re-roll will be done January 15, 2013.
Adrian
On 12 December 2012 17:39, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
The AR9285 is a 2GHz only NIC.
The channel list shows 11b, 11bg, HT20 and HT40 channels.
It all looks right, why don't you think it is?
Adrian
On 12 December 2012 17:32, A
Hey there gary,
this works for talktalk/UK ADSL modem in PPPoE mode, or did beore my house
move ill double cobnfirm in 6 days when my new line is active.
#talktalk:
set reconnect 999 1
set device PPPoE:xl0 # replace xl1 with your Ethernet device
set authname my-house-p
Bad news everyone,
tl;dr The git mirror of the source repository needs to be re-rolled to
make the conversion deterministically repeatable, this will change
pretty much all git commit hashes.
The re-roll will be done January 15, 2013.
Not affected are the ports and doc repositories, nor is the s
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 12/15/12, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
Because of the different grouping of the multiplications, the second
is unfortunately slower (1 more multiplication that cannot be done at
compile time). The second also gives unnecessary (but findamental to
the m
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Oliver Pinter wrote:
What is this 1844674407309000LL constant?
This is
2**64 / 10**6 * 10**3
obfuscated by printing it in hex and doing the scaling by powers of
10 manually, and then giving it a bogus type using the abominable
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Oliver Pinter wrote:
635 - return tticks;
636 + getbinuptime(&pbt);
637 + bt.sec = data / 1000;
638 + bt.frac = (data % 1000) * (uint64_t)1844674407309000LL;
639 + bintime_add(&bt, &pbt);
640 + return bt;
Style bugs: missing spaces aroun
On 12/15/12, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>
>> 635 - return tticks;
>> 636 + getbinuptime(&pbt);
>> 637 + bt.sec = data / 1000;
>> 638 + bt.frac = (data % 1000) * (uint64_t)1844674407309000LL;
>> 639 + bintime_add(&bt, &pbt);
>> 640 +
24 matches
Mail list logo