On 3 December 2012 10:41, Gary Palmer wrote:
> While not commenting on the correctness of the current contents, the userland
> PPP section of the FAQ appears to mostly deal with dialup modems. I suspect
> more people use it now to do PPPoA or PPPoE for some form of DSL link and
> there probably n
On 12/14/12 04:55, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following this thread :
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-March/032519.html
>
> I have finally taken time to track this regression. It occurs with
> revision 231797 :
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revi
On 12/14/12 16:08, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-12-14 15:14, Guido Falsi wrote:
I have stumbled upon a solved bug in clang 3.2 while testing some ports:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14491
Fixed in this commit:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=169451
Should the f
On 2012-12-14 15:14, Guido Falsi wrote:
I have stumbled upon a solved bug in clang 3.2 while testing some ports:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14491
Fixed in this commit:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=169451
Should the fix be imported in FreeBSD??
Yes, it will
on 14/12/2012 17:00 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
> I'm using official tools, not open ones. Will try to repeat this at saturday
> with
> openvm tools.
> I could place somewhere their archive. Btw, they require compat6x.
Using third-party binary modules with head does not always work.
co
I'm using official tools, not open ones. Will try to repeat this at
saturday with openvm tools.
I could place somewhere their archive. Btw, they require compat6x.
Regards, Alexander Yerenkow
14.12.2012 16:39 пользователь "Andriy Gapon" написал:
> on 14/12/2012 14:46 Alexander Yerenkow said the f
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 635 - return tticks;
> 636 + getbinuptime(&pbt);
> 637 + bt.sec = data / 1000;
> 638 + bt.frac = (data % 1000) * (uint64_t)1844674407309000LL;
> 639 + bintime_add(&bt, &pbt);
> 640 + return bt
on 14/12/2012 14:46 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
> Setup: ESXi 5.1.0
> Seems this happens when vmmemctl.ko loaded (from their latest vmtools), and
> when
> you give a bit more memory than there is free.
This is weird... As I can see in os_kmem_alloc function (in
modules/freebsd/vmmemctl
Looks like it's been imported to the 3.2 branch, so we should get it when dim
pulls in the latest version.
David
On 14 Dec 2012, at 14:14, Guido Falsi wrote:
> I have stumbled upon a solved bug in clang 3.2 while testing some ports:
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14491
>
> Fixed in
Hi!
635 - return tticks;
636 + getbinuptime(&pbt);
637 + bt.sec = data / 1000;
638 + bt.frac = (data % 1000) * (uint64_t)1844674407309000LL;
639 + bintime_add(&bt, &pbt);
640 + return bt;
641 }
What is this 1844674407309000LL constant?
783 @@ -275,7
I have stumbled upon a solved bug in clang 3.2 while testing some ports:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14491
Fixed in this commit:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=169451
Should the fix be imported in FreeBSD??
Thanks.
--
Guido Falsi
_
Hi,
Ok. I'm travelling for a little bit; if I don't reply in a few days,
please poke me again.
It may be that the device is asleep for a bit longer (failing this
test) and has completed resetting at this point.
It may be that the power on sequence is not quite right for some reason.
Would you m
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>> This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
>>> implementation. The main objective of this
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
F> First LOR, apparently in PF:
F>
F> altq: emulate 25600Hz cpu clock
F> lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable)
F> 1st 0x81390418 pf rulesets (pf rulesets) @
/data/freebsd/src/head/sys/modules/pf/../../net
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>> This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
>> implementation. The main objective of this work is making the
>> subsystem tickless. In the last several yea
Hi everyone,
Following this thread :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-March/032519.html
I have finally taken time to track this regression. It occurs with
revision 231797 :
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=231797
Could anyone have a look at it ?
Bes
Setup: ESXi 5.1.0
Seems this happens when vmmemctl.ko loaded (from their latest vmtools), and
when you give a bit more memory than there is free.
2012/12/13 Andriy Gapon
> on 13/12/2012 12:46 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
> > 2012/12/13 Alexander Yerenkow
> >
> >> Hello there.
> >> I
Hello list,
I'm getting multipe LORs at boot on 10-CURRENT r244183 built yesterday on amd64.
Anyone else getting these ?
Anything I can do to help get them fixed ?
My make.conf contains:
===
CC=clang
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
# This setting to build world without -Werror
NO_WERROR=
# This se
I ran installworld and am stuck here:
===> /usr.sbin/fifolog/fifolog_writer (install)
Well, after a power cycle it boots and reports to be r244114. I
have run 'svn up' and am going to try it again- seems like it will
try to build r244201.
Actually, right now I do not recall whether or not
On 12/14/12 00:51, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote:
> This patch work for me. Thanks.
>
> On Friday 14 December 2012 00:30:52 Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> Can you please try the attached patch, against x11-servers/xorg-server.
>> Apply it and recompile xorg-server with normal flags (that is, no
>> debuggin
On 12/14/12 01:24, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
> wrote:
>> This patch work for me. Thanks.
> I can confirm that it also works for me. Thanks a lot!
>
>> On Friday 14 December 2012 00:30:52 Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>
>>> Can you please try the att
21 matches
Mail list logo
