> Has something changed in the scheduler recently?
Yes: r242736, r242852+r243069.
Your description of your problem is a bit vague, but you might start
by looking at the effect of the above commits.
b.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Hi All,
Has something changed in the scheduler recently? I don't have anything
concrete, just anecdotal evidence, but my current desktop feels a little
less responsive under heavy CPU load than it did a few weeks ago.
Usually my high CPU processes (builds) are nice'd, but even with that,
thing sti
On 11/13/12 18:51, AN wrote:
> Can anyone comment on current built with clang as default compiler and
> ports? Are there any major problems, programs that don't run?
> Specifically, I am interested in how Gnome and Xorg (Gnome and Xorg
> built with default system gcc) work on world built with cla
This is all good advice. Note, however:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:59:49AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Of special interest are the results from the build cluster, where you
> can get a quick overview of which ports don't build, and how many other
> ports depend on them.
Unfortunately those we
Having new amd 8120 box with asus m5a97 mobo, I wait to
install 9.1 on it. Both RC1 ad RC2 live memsticks images
failed to show temperatures. Some posts reported of using
amdtemp source from head successfully. What is the lattest
amdtemp source on head?
I assume I could go to /usr/src/dyd/dev/amdte
on 21/11/2012 09:51 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
> Problem solved. Raidz pool mount without zpool.cache.
>
>
> # zpool status -v
> pool: zsolar
> state: ONLINE
> scan: resilvered 2,56M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Nov 20 10:26:35 2012
> config:
>
> NAME STATE
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:45:43PM +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
> On 2012-11-19, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > First, pw should not fail if other instance is running, it should wait
> > instead (think of parallel batch scripts adding some users/groups).
> >
> > Second, current code has a race:
> > loc
On 2012-11-19, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> First, pw should not fail if other instance is running, it should wait
> instead (think of parallel batch scripts adding some users/groups).
>
> Second, current code has a race:
> lockfd = open(group_file, O_RDONLY, 0);
> if (lockfd < 0 || fcntl(lockfd, F_SETF
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
> E> Cherry-picking would be when tehre is reasonable similarities.
> E> Also another argument to do this would be simplicity on locking as well
> as
> E> i told you when you starte
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:44:13PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> Cherry-picking would be when tehre is reasonable similarities.
E> Also another argument to do this would be simplicity on locking as well as
E> i told you when you started the changes.
You were wrong. OpenBSD doesn't move towards SMP m
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> M> For one thing, I'm desperately awaiting NAT64 support (the 'af-to'
> M> translation rule in newer pf (5.1?), committed on 2011-10).
>
> Backport this exact featu
Andre
I'll try to do it today or next monday when I get back from vacation . They
are all hp branded nic's . I ordered them with in the last few years to use in
place of bce nic's on the main boards of hp servers .
---
On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Hello
>
> I cur
12 matches
Mail list logo
