On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:31 PM, George Neville-Neil
wrote:
...
> BTW, sorry to come in late on the thread. Would this cause the loader
> to reset the machine? On a box in my work testlab I have not
> been able to use a recent /boot/loader for a few weeks.
>
> I get to the BIOS drive C: is dis
On Oct 18, 2012, at 14:48 , Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 05:13:47PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> | On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> | > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> | > Hash: SHA256
> |
> | ...
> |
> | > Ah I wish I am not this far behind my email b
> I guess the real bug is that we've been installing these, but never
> referencing them, or telling users where they could find them... I.e.
> in man vi:
>``An Introduction to Display Editing with Vi'', found in the ``UNIX
>User's Manual Supplementary Documents'' section of bo
In message <201210191723.31156@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>> What about FreeBSD 1.x ?
>
>I don't have any copies of that history, do you?
http://phk.freebsd.dk/FreeBSD
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
Fr
On Friday, October 19, 2012 5:16:04 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <201210191412.37661@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>
> >I recently converted CSRG's SCCS repository holding the original BSD history
> >to a Subversion repository. As a derivative work of CSRG's code
>> Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
> found online using a search engine of you
In message <201210191412.37661@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>I recently converted CSRG's SCCS repository holding the original BSD history
>to a Subversion repository. As a derivative work of CSRG's code base, this
>repository is available under the terms of the original UC Be
On 20 October 2012 00:34, Andrew Milton wrote:
> +---[ John Baldwin ]--
> | I recently converted CSRG's SCCS repository holding the original BSD history
> | to a Subversion repository. As a derivative work of CSRG's code base, this
> | repository is available under the ter
+---[ John Baldwin ]--
| I recently converted CSRG's SCCS repository holding the original BSD history
| to a Subversion repository. As a derivative work of CSRG's code base, this
| repository is available under the terms of the original UC Berkeley license.
|
| You can b
I recently converted CSRG's SCCS repository holding the original BSD history
to a Subversion repository. As a derivative work of CSRG's code base, this
repository is available under the terms of the original UC Berkeley license.
You can browse the history at http://svnweb.freebsd.org/csrg/
The
That's not what I want; If you press question mark at root prompt - to view
choices, all devices are seen without /dev/, which leads further to single
user mode fall-in. You can see screens with this situation. I think patch
should be limited to ufs, then all should be ok - we could specify disk
wi
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 00:04 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Sean Bruno
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Sure, I will separate it out.
> > >
> > > If there are no further comments, can I ask Sean to commit
> on my
>
On 19.10.2012 20:21, Alex Keda wrote:
> On 19.10.2012 19:59, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 19 October 2012 16:16, Alex Keda wrote:
>>> On 19.10.2012 19:10, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
> pkg command does not have key for list options - no autocompletions
>
>>
On 19-10-2012 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
> found online using a se
> > Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
> > > those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> > > tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> > > date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably al
On 19.10.2012 19:59, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 October 2012 16:16, Alex Keda wrote:
>> On 19.10.2012 19:10, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>>> On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
pkg command does not have key for list options - no autocompletions
for example, for service command, I use
>>
On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
> over to the doc repository.
Moving them to the doc repo loses the history, for what gain?
You mention that the roff sources are 'naughty'. Are they holding up
some project?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 08:55:42AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
> > those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> > tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> > date an
On 19 October 2012 16:16, Alex Keda wrote:
> On 19.10.2012 19:10, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
>>> On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
concerned by the
Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
> those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
> found onl
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 00:04 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Sean Bruno
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Sure, I will separate it out.
> > >
> > > If there are no further comments, can I ask Sean to commit
> on my
>
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:52:57 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/10/2012 18:33 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 18/10/2012 18:20 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >> My guess is that the easiest way to avoid this ambiguity and the confusion
> >> that it
> >> causes (like the problem yo
On 10/19/12 09:25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Firewire is
- a significant security risk
- an obstacle to functining suspend / resume on many systems
- rapidly becoming obsolete
- available as a module
The attached patch removes it from GENERIC across the board. Any
serious objections b
On 19.10.2012 19:10, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
>> On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
>>> concerned by the announce.
>>>
>>> As nvidia-drivers has been fixed
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 07:25 -0700, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Once more, with patch.
>
> DES
Ack. I think this is sensible.
Sean
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote:
> On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
>> concerned by the announce.
>>
>> As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
>> ports
On 10/19/2012 7:45 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
On 19 Oct 2012, at 15:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They ca
On 10/10/2012 8:44 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
> concerned by the announce.
>
> As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
> ports tree as been switch by default to use pkgng
On 19 Oct 2012, at 15:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
> tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
> date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
> found online us
On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
> concerned by the announce.
>
> As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
> ports tree as been switch by default to use pkgng o
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Firewire is
> >
> > - a significant security risk
> > - an obstacle to functining suspend / resume on many systems
> > - rapidly becoming obsolete
> > - available as a module
>
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online using a search engine of your choice.
Should people feel strongly
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Firewire is
>
> - a significant security risk
> - an obstacle to functining suspend / resume on many systems
> - rapidly becoming obsolete
> - available as a module
>
> The attached patch removes it from GENERIC across the board. A
Once more, with patch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Index: amd64/conf/GENERIC
===
--- amd64/conf/GENERIC (revision 241722)
+++ amd64/conf/GENERIC (working copy)
@@ -317,15 +317,6 @@
device ukbd # Keyboard
device uma
Firewire is
- a significant security risk
- an obstacle to functining suspend / resume on many systems
- rapidly becoming obsolete
- available as a module
The attached patch removes it from GENERIC across the board. Any
serious objections before I commit it to head?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørg
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-19 07:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
2012/10/18 Andriy Gapon :
> on 18/10/2012 18:33 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 18/10/2012 18:20 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> My guess is that the easiest way to avoid this ambiguity and the confusion
>>> that it
>>> causes (like the problem you described above) is to prepend "/dev/
TB --- 2012-10-19 04:21:30 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-19 04:21:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Sure, I will separate it out.
> > >
> > > If there are no further comments, can I ask Sean to commit on my
> > > behalf?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Can you do the man page to include both in the commit?
> > Except that point seems good to m
41 matches
Mail list logo
