Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Dennis Glatting
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:16 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 04-10-2012 16:50, Dennis Glatting escreveu: > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD > >> > and no serious complaints

Re: [CFT]hwpmc update for sandybridge-e

2012-10-04 Thread Jim Harris
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > So, I did the bear minimum and kind of hacked things together without > understanding precisely what I was doing, and I was able to massage the > sandybridge-e CPUs into giving me some basic functions. > > Comments or concerns before I commit thi

Re: sysctl kern.ipc.somaxconn limit 65535 why?

2012-10-04 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 4 October 2012 15:21, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Oct-03 19:45:01 +0100, free...@chrysalisnet.org wrote: >>In addition we had to migrate all our mysql servers from freebsd to debian >>because they were hitting some arbitary OS limit but I could never figure >>out what, sys% usage went through

[CFT]hwpmc update for sandybridge-e

2012-10-04 Thread Sean Bruno
So, I did the bear minimum and kind of hacked things together without understanding precisely what I was doing, and I was able to massage the sandybridge-e CPUs into giving me some basic functions. Comments or concerns before I commit this? http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/pmc_sandybridge.txt S

Re: sysctl kern.ipc.somaxconn limit 65535 why?

2012-10-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Oct-03 19:45:01 +0100, free...@chrysalisnet.org wrote: >In addition we had to migrate all our mysql servers from freebsd to debian >because they were hitting some arbitary OS limit but I could never figure >out what, sys% usage went through the roof when this limit was hit, issue >didnt occ

Re: svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread Rick Macklem
John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:10:11 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC > > a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of > > mergeinfo. (It looks like every directory under sys.) > > > > D

Re: [SPAM]Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-10-04 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:24 +0200, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: > W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze: > > Hello, Marek. > > You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35: > > > >>> atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0 > > MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host > >

Re: [SPAM]Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-10-04 Thread Marek Salwerowicz
W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze: Hello, Marek. You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35: atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0 MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host MS> Do you have any solution? In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded c

Re: memory warnings r240891 | dmesgg

2012-10-04 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 4 October 2012 20:18, Darrel wrote: > Hello, > > Swap was created twice on this 9.0 release candidate install- once as > part of zfs and also as encrypted hard drive space. > > (30) @ 12:01:50> swapinfo > Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity > /dev/zvol/bigD/swap 4194304

Re: svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:10:11 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC > a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of > mergeinfo. (It looks like every directory under sys.) > > Does this matter or is there a tric

Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18 and 4.2 (Windows host): hangs up after atrtc0 detection

2012-10-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Marek. You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35: >> atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0 MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host MS> Do you have any solution? In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded chipset... -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov

Re: svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 October 2012 14:35, Rick Macklem wrote: > Sean Bruno wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC >> > a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of >> > mergeinfo. (It lo

Re: svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread Rick Macklem
Sean Bruno wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC > > a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of > > mergeinfo. (It looks like every directory under sys.) > > > > Does this

Re: svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC > a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of > mergeinfo. (It looks like every directory under sys.) > > Does this matter or is there a trick to a

memory warnings r240891 | dmesgg

2012-10-04 Thread Darrel
Hello, Swap was created twice on this 9.0 release candidate install- once as part of zfs and also as encrypted hard drive space. (30) @ 12:01:50> swapinfo Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity /dev/zvol/bigD/swap 41943040 4194304 0% /dev/gpt/swap0.eli 3145728

svn MFC to stable/8

2012-10-04 Thread Rick Macklem
Hi, Hopefully someone familiar with svn can help. When I try to MFC a kernel change to stable/8, it works, but I end up with tons of mergeinfo. (It looks like every directory under sys.) Does this matter or is there a trick to avoid this? Thanks in advance for any help, rick ps: I seem to MFC fi

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Chuck Burns
On 10/4/2012 11:26 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: BTW, its good to see BSD-licensed tools gradually replacing GNU tools in base. Though I'd have really preferred to see resources directed towards getting XEN/Dom0 support to FreeBSD/amd64. This really needs some love, IMHO. ;-) Gabor Thanks, -cpghost.

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 04-10-2012 16:50, Dennis Glatting escreveu: >> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD >>> > and no serious complaints have been

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 04-10-2012 16:50, Dennis Glatting escreveu: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD >> > and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I >> > plan to permanently r

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Dennis Glatting
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Hi, > > it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD > and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I > plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days. If you > have any obj

[HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi, it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days. If you have any objection, please raise it now. Gabor _

fusefs-sshfs crash

2012-10-04 Thread Talovikov Boris Aleksandrovich
root@hummingbird:boris# uname -a FreeBSD hummingbird.dev 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #41 r241078: Mon Oct 1 21:18:05 YEKT 2012 r...@hummingbird.dev:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HUMMINGBIRD i386 root@hummingbird:boris# tail /var/log/messages ... Oct 4 11:29:04 hummingbird su: boris to root on /