Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:14:36PM -0400, Darrel wrote: >> >>> Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works >>> anymore... >>> -Garrett >>> >> >> Thank you. >> >> Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many ex

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:14:36PM -0400, Darrel wrote: > > > Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works > > anymore... > > -Garrett > > > > Thank you. > > Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many exceptions- the > steps would have been included in an Open

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Darrel
Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works anymore... -Garrett Thank you. Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many exceptions- the steps would have been included in an OpenBSD update that required portions of the tree to be recompiled. Darrel

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Darrel wrote: Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works anymore... -Garrett ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe,

Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Darrel
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Darrel wrote: Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10? No. So I ran mergemaster and upgraded zpool from '28' to 'zpool-features' and installed the new bootcode to ada0 and ada1. The next step needs to be right before I can reboot. pfctl and snmp_pf need

More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-21 Thread Dimitry Andric
Hi all, As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0 kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also tested the performance with different compiler optimization settings. Th

open-sshd uses non-default Kerberos cred cache breaking Kerberized NFS

2012-09-21 Thread Rick Macklem
Herbert emailed with a problem using the kerberized NFS client in FreeBSD. He has been able to isolate the problem to the fact that the sshd he uses (from open-sshd in ports) uses a non-default tgt credentials cache. The problem is that the gssd sets KRB5CCNAME to /tmp/krb5cc_, where is the effec

Proposal for change to kernel linker for fixing a VNET and DPCPU problem.

2012-09-21 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/21/12 2:22 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:28:16AM -0700, Anuranjan Shukla wrote: Hi George, Thanks for taking a look. Some answers/comments below. Building FreeBSD without the network stack (network stack as a module) --

Re: Call for bge(4) testers

2012-09-21 Thread Wanpeng Qian
>On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:56:09AM +0900, Wanpeng Qian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:37:21PM +0900, Wanpeng Qian wrote: >> >> Hi, here is the dmesg output. >> >> >> >> bge0: mem >> >> 0xfe9f-0xfe9f irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 >> >> bge0: CHIP ID 0x05784100; ASIC REV

Re: ia64 panic: make_dev_credv: bad si_name (error=17, si_name=pass3)

2012-09-21 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From j...@freebsd.org Thu Sep 20 20:30:06 2012 On Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:53:30 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On ia64 r235474 I added another > disk and did "camcontrol rescan all" > to see it. I got this panic: > > panic: make_dev_c

pf startup: KDB stack backtrace -restarted

2012-09-21 Thread Kim Culhan
Running -current r240768 at boot and on reload with pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf a considerable amount of KDB backtrace data is logged. The data at boot from dmesg is located at: http://pastebin.com/uEJH97Em thanks -kim ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing