Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 06.06.12 05:31, Erich wrote: On 05 June 2012 10:55:57 Chris Rees wrote: It is absolutely a bad idea for "beginners" to be using tagged/dated ports trees-- they are not supported and will lead to many complaints about problems that were solved since the tag. How do they fall back when thing

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 06 June 2012 0:42:47 Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <1541214.zfrdxxb...@x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > Hi, > > > > On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? > > Entire tree. my problem with this is that the documentation states something very different: >From the handbook at the l

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 10:55:57 Chris Rees wrote: > On 5 June 2012 09:25, Erich wrote: > > On 05 June 2012 3:08:17 b. f. wrote: > >> > On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: > >> > > > >> > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > >> > > > Hi, > >> > > > > >> > Al

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not > > branched. > > If you create a branch,

Unable to buildworld with ccache

2012-06-05 Thread Sevan / Venture37
Hi, Buildworld completes successfully with ccache switched off, it fails otherwise, system was built WITH_CLANG_IS_CC previously. /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/a

Re: est man page

2012-06-05 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors > that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have > Speedstep features: > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > est1: on cpu1 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep,

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-05 18:14:30 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-05 18:14:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

est man page

2012-06-05 Thread Sean Bruno
I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have Speedstep features: p4tcc0: on cpu0 est1: on cpu1 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 15 device_a

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-05 14:23:10 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-05 14:23:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: 10-CURRENT r235646 && open-vm-tools-8.6.0-425873

2012-06-05 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:27:51 am Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Thursday, May 31, 2012 a las 11:34:55AM -0400, John Baldwin escribió: > > > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > > > if_vxn.c: In function 'vxn_load_multicast': > > > if_vxn.c:719: warning: implicit declaration of function 'I

Re: 10-CURRENT r235646 && open-vm-tools-8.6.0-425873

2012-06-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, June 05, 2012 a las 03:27:51PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > cc -O2 -pipe -Wall -Werror -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL > -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > -I/usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-tools/work/open-vm-tools-8.6.0-425873/lib/include > > -I/usr/ports/emulators/open-vm-to

Re: 10-CURRENT r235646 && open-vm-tools-8.6.0-425873

2012-06-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, May 31, 2012 a las 11:34:55AM -0400, John Baldwin escribió: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > > if_vxn.c: In function 'vxn_load_multicast': > > if_vxn.c:719: warning: implicit declaration of function 'IF_ADDR_LOCK' > > if_vxn.c:719: warning: nested extern declaration of

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not > > branched. > > If you create a branch,

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote: > But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? Entire tree. mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-06-05 09:16:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-06-05 09:16:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Rees
On 5 June 2012 09:25, Erich wrote: > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 3:08:17 b. f. wrote: >> > On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: >> > > >> > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Rees
On Jun 5, 2012 3:07 AM, "Erich" wrote: > > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > Version tagging is just a convient way to get a snapshot at a > > particular point in time unless you create branches that are them > > we do not ask for more. There should be only one differe

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread b. f.
On 6/5/12, Erich wrote: > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 3:08:17 b. f. wrote: >> > On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: >> > > >> > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 3:08:17 b. f. wrote: > > On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree.

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not > > branched. > > If you create a branch,

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread Erich
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:01:37 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:18:33PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it. > > The EOL announcements have them. I don't think the release announcements > do, however. > this is the problem

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

2012-06-05 Thread b. f.
> On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > In message <3506767.Fvm2KmtnYf at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > > > > > > > > On 05 J