Re: Customizing ubldr build...

2012-05-23 Thread Tim Kientzle
On May 23, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > This looks fine to me. > > Thanks for this! What's the pandaboard require, just out of curiosity? Based on a quick skim of the OMAP 4460 TRM, it looks like the Pandaboard ES should come up with the same general memory layout as the BeagleBone,

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Mark Linimon" On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any > big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving > to ZFS with all the benefits that brings? - ZFS eats bytes for breakfast. It is completely

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Lev Serebryakov" Or should we call FFS officially dead and promote ZFS as only usable FS on modern FreeBSD now? Slightly OT but I must say I'm a big fan of ZFS since I first tried it under FreeBSD a few years back. Not only is it a dream to use as an admi

Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails

2012-05-23 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 05/19/12 22:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:55 AM, O. Hartmann >> wrote: >>> Since approx. a week for now, I can not build FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 >>> anymore! This happens to be on ALL(!) FreeBSD 10 boxes around h

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Konstantin. You wrote 23 мая 2012 г., 17:10:46: KB> This panic is another protective panic caused by on-disk inconsistent KB> structures. The bitmap indicated that an inode was free, but actual inode KB> context suggested that the inode is in use. KB> I would not worry much about ffs code

Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails

2012-05-23 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/19/12 22:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:55 AM, O. Hartmann > wrote: >> Since approx. a week for now, I can not build FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 >> anymore! This happens to be on ALL(!) FreeBSD 10 boxes around here I >> maintain. > > ... > >> b) build and install /usr

Re: RFC: [PATCH] disabling buckets under "low memory"

2012-05-23 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin < maksim.yevmen...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > > would anyone object to the following patch? > > No objection. There shouldn't be any controversy here. Your patch is correct. The existing code in UMA is doing the wrong comparison. Alan > ===

RFC: [PATCH] disabling buckets under "low memory"

2012-05-23 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
hello, would anyone object to the following patch? === Index: uma_core.c === --- uma_core.c (revision 616) +++ uma_core.c (working copy) @@ -267,10 +267,7 @@ static void bucket_enable(void) { - if (cnt.v_free_count < cnt.

Re: Customizing ubldr build...

2012-05-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
This looks fine to me. Thanks for this! What's the pandaboard require, just out of curiousity? Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curr

Re: FreeBSD 10 prognostication...

2012-05-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. then: * test out pkgng on FreeBSD-9.x and provide as much feedback as you can; * help test out massive deployment, upgrade and auditing scenarios - exactly the kinds of things which cloud using people need. Installing 1 boxes is difficult. Auditing, upgrading and integrating services on 10,

Re: (no subject) (was panic in vfs_lookup/kern_statat_vnhook?)

2012-05-23 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:28:53 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > > (kgdb) frame 7 > > > > #7 0xc0878682 in pmap_enter (pmap=3D0xc09e4060, va=3D3359633408, acc= > ess=3D7 '\a'

Re:

2012-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:42:14 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:28:53 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > (kgdb) frame 7 > > > #7 0xc0878682 in pmap_enter (pmap=0xc09e4060, va=3359633408, access=7 '\a' > , > > > m=0xc191bf70, prot=7 '\a', wired=1)

Re: (no subject)

2012-05-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:28:53 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > (kgdb) frame 7 > > > #7 0xc0878682 in pmap_enter (pmap=0xc09e4060, va=3359633408, access=7 > > > '\a' > , > > > m=0xc191bf70, prot=7 '\a'

(no subject)

2012-05-23 Thread Ian FREISLICH
John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:28:53 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > (kgdb) frame 7 > > #7 0xc0878682 in pmap_enter (pmap=0xc09e4060, va=3359633408, access=7 '\a' , > > m=0xc191bf70, prot=7 '\a', wired=1) at > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c:1596 > > 1596ro

Re: panic in vfs_lookup/kern_statat_vnhook?

2012-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:28:53 am Ian FREISLICH wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:36:06 pm Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I've had quite a few reproduceable panics that look to be VFS > > > related. The trigger is relatively heavy concurrent disk IO. > >

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:40:34AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > I have a machine that since updated to r235609 started to constantly panic > in the FS code while building universe, first with > > ufs_dirbad: /scratch: bad dir ino 1137225 at offset 17920: mangled entry > > which a clri

Re: Broken symbolic links in /usr/lib after compiling and installing -CURRENT

2012-05-23 Thread Ilya Bakulin
On Tue, May 22, 2012 2:27 pm, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > This is expected I think, as "make buildenv" defines $_SHLIBDIRPREFIX > which is used to make the toolchain use libraries built during stage 4.2 > of buildworld. > > Just run "make installworld" with the correct DESTDIR and your chroot > will be

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-05-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-05-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-05-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-05-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-05-23 06:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-