[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-02-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - /u

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> 3) Add a new option to ldconfig to prepend new libraries to >> the hints files and fix the ports to use this option instead >> of -m. > > You don't want system binaries that want /lib/libgcc_s.so

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: ... Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose that this is a heads up for

Re: Fwd: Effect of Processor and Memory on KDE4 execution speed

2012-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:42 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote: > > > > > > Original Message > > Subject: > > Effect of Processor and Memory on > > KDE4 execution speed > > Date:

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall > >> not be) in

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:52:08 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: > > >>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall > not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? > - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? > - if_cxgb > - if_cxgbe Last time I t

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:42:59 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace > > > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required > > > by /

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Scott Long
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall >> not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? > > No specific reason for these two: > >> -

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Scott Long
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) > in GENERIC (at least on i386)? > - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? > - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x8

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: ... Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose that this is a heads up for

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: > > >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: > >>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>>On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > >>>... > >>

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Mel Flynn
On 2/21/2012 23:32, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> ... Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose that this is

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:22:50AM +0100, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 2/21/2012 23:32, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>> On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > >>> ... > Ye

Re: Fwd: Effect of Processor and Memory on KDE4 execution speed

2012-02-21 Thread Devin Teske
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:42 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote: > > > Original Message > Subject: > Effect of Processor and Memory on > KDE4 execution speed > Date: > Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:39:36 -0500 >

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > > ... > > > Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose > > > that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is use

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > ... > > Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose > > that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by > > the ports collections to build a large number of other > > por

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: ... > Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose > that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by > the ports collections to build a large number of other > ports, so others are likely to hit this issue. The same applies to libstdc++.s

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:42:59AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace > > > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by >

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace > > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /home/kargl/bin/halfspace > > not foundtroutmask:kargl[211] > > > > (No

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Sorry about the cross post, but I can't tell if this > a -current issue of a -ports issue. Unfortunately, > I updated my freebsd 10.0 systems and the lang/gcc > port during the same timeframe. > > I have compiled my math library and s

rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
Sorry about the cross post, but I can't tell if this a -current issue of a -ports issue. Unfortunately, I updated my freebsd 10.0 systems and the lang/gcc port during the same timeframe. I have compiled my math library and several programs with gfortran, which is installed by lang/gcc (pkg_info

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall > not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? No specific reason for these two: > - if_cxgb > - if_cxgbe But I do prefer to load them as modules (an

Re: NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Andrew Gallatin
On 02/21/12 09:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? <> - if_mxge <> Speaking for mxge, it requires the better part of 1MB worth of firmware files, and it is a rather uncommon

AMD K15 sensor support

2012-02-21 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
I was wondering if anyone is aware of any ongoing effort to support the on CPU temp sensors on the AMD K15 CPU's amdtemp only supports up to K11 so far as I can tell Sam Fourman Jr. Titan# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 19

NICs not in GENERIC

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? - if_cxgb - if_cxgbe - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? - if_hme: is compiled as a module

[CFT] modular kernel config

2012-02-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and 9.x) and a suitable loader.conf which: - tries to provide as much features as GENERIC (I lost one or two disk controllers, they are not available as a module... or I didn't find them) - incorporates some more fea

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-21 Thread vermaden
Hi, I have created a PORT at last, its in the 'port' directory in the usual place: https://github.com/vermaden/automount/ Its my first PORT so feel free to bash me about my mistakes ;) After latest 'commits' I think that its ready for day-to-day use. To make 'full advantage' of *automount* in

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-02-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - /usr/bin/c