On 02/12/12 12:29, Hannes Mehnert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently got a X220 and installed -CURRENT (with kib's 13.1 patch) on
> it - let me add some notes on this thread.
>
> On 10/17/2011 03:53, Matt wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 16:01, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Garrett Coope
I decided to try burning an image from Index of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/powerpc/powerpc/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/
And here are the following errors:
1.) The usb image doesn't boot. From following Whitehorn and others on
the FreeBSD PowerPC mailing list, one needs to have the bootloader
d
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:04:45AM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> I would be very happy I can contribute anything to development of FreeBSD .
We are always happy to have help :-)
> If there appears an agenda of testing problems and explicit instructions
> how to apply tests , me and other
On (18/02/2012 10:48), vermaden wrote:
> Added a check if ntfs-3g is available, if not then mount_ntfs is used instead.
> Added deleting of empty directories at ${MNTPREFIX}.
> Added ${MNTPREFIX} to be set to /mnt or /media according to preference
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/
On Saturday 18 February 2012 10:48:11 vermaden wrote:
> Added a check if ntfs-3g is available, if not then mount_ntfs is used
> instead. Added deleting of empty directories at ${MNTPREFIX}.
> Added ${MNTPREFIX} to be set to /mnt or /media according to preference
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> PATH=/bin:/sbin
Added a check if ntfs-3g is available, if not then mount_ntfs is used instead.
Added deleting of empty directories at ${MNTPREFIX}.
Added ${MNTPREFIX} to be set to /mnt or /media according to preference
#! /bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
MNTPREFIX="/media
In message <20120218074655.gf31...@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>I always wonder if it's worth defining a type for this, resid_t or
>something,
Wouldn't that naturally be size_t ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
* Poul-Henning Kamp [120218 00:34] wrote:
> In message <20120218074655.gf31...@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>
> >I always wonder if it's worth defining a type for this, resid_t or
> >something,
>
> Wouldn't that naturally be size_t ?
I think that makes sense. I was thinking along th
* Konstantin Belousov [120217 17:54] wrote:
> This is a notification to allow you to comment on the patch before the
> commit.
>
> I will commit the latest version of the patch to remove the limitation
> of the maximal i/o size for read/write syscalls to INT_MAX in the
> beginning of the next wee
