[CFT] pw(8) using pw/gr API from libutil

2012-02-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I have been modifying pw(8) it order for it to user the pw_* and gr_* function from libutil, to: avoid code duplication have a single API to manipulate user/group things. I have been using this version for a while now and it works quite well to me, I'm just missing testing in real NIS env

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. In the same line that Wojciech on the PR ".cshrc should be u

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:52:58 -0500 Eitan Adler wrote: > In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) > there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. > > I'd like to commit something like the following based on Chris's patch > at the end of the thread.

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) > there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. > > I'd like to commit something like the following based on Chris's patch > at the end of the thread. Thi

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

2012-02-09 Thread Dmitry Mikulin
On 02/09/2012 04:17 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:48:26PM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: The semantic of PL_FLAG_EXEC up until now is very simple: it indicates that current stop occured during the first return to usermode after successful exec. The proposed patch brea

Re: USB3 and a Seagate FA GoFlex

2012-02-09 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 10 February 2012 01:22:53 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > hello list, > > I bought a new Seagate FA GoFlex USB3 removable disk running FreeBSD 10.x > CURRENT this disk functions correctly on a USB 2.0 port (I can use zpool > create to create a ZFS pool) > however when attached to a USB 3.0 port

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 02/10/12 11:52, Eitan Adler wrote: > In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) > there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. > > I'd like to commit something like the following based on Chris's patch > at the end of the thread. This post is an

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
Do the promptchars work correctly on csh as well as tcsh? Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-09 Thread Eitan Adler
In conf/160689 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160689) there has been some discussion about changing the default cshrc file. I'd like to commit something like the following based on Chris's patch at the end of the thread. This post is an attempt to open the change to wider discussion.

USB3 and a Seagate FA GoFlex

2012-02-09 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
hello list, I bought a new Seagate FA GoFlex USB3 removable disk running FreeBSD 10.x CURRENT this disk functions correctly on a USB 2.0 port (I can use zpool create to create a ZFS pool) however when attached to a USB 3.0 port it does not function correctly when attempting to create a zpool i get

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

2012-02-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:48:26PM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: > > >The semantic of PL_FLAG_EXEC up until now is very simple: it indicates > >that current stop occured during the first return to usermode after > >successful exec. The proposed patch breaks the semantic, because now > >some stops w

zfs commit breaks zvol, istgt?

2012-02-09 Thread Mark Felder
Hi all, Previous kernel I was running on a test SAN was 9-STABLE from Jan 24th. Sorry, no commit # -- didn't have svn on the machine back then. Today I built r231282 because it had an interesting fix in it: r231141 | mm | 2012-02-07 11:57:33 -0600 (Tue, 07 Feb 2012) | 25 lines MFC r230514:

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

2012-02-09 Thread Dmitry Mikulin
The semantic of PL_FLAG_EXEC up until now is very simple: it indicates that current stop occured during the first return to usermode after successful exec. The proposed patch breaks the semantic, because now some stops which satisfy the stated condition are no longer marked with the flag. That

Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

2012-02-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:51:57PM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: > The patch I sent earlier works for me. Just wanted to let you know to > illustrate what I would like to see from the kernel. > > I'm trying to see if there's way not to add flags with semantics similar to > TDB_EXEC. I think the p