Re: [ptrace] please review follow fork/exec changes

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:12:13AM -0800, Dmitry Mikulin wrote: > Attached are 4 separate patches for each somewhat independent portion of > the kernel work related to the follow-fork implementation. Ok, as I said, I think that vfork-fork.patch is just wrong. Lets postpone discussion of the orpha

Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

On 01/28/2012 01:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/01/2012 11:37 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 01/28/2012 01:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 28/01/2012 11:13 Doug Barton said the following: On 01/27/2012 10:21, John Baldwin wrote: > Does it operate fully with NEW_PCIB disabled entirel

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 21:06:59 +: > > On 28. Jan 2012, at 08:19 , Daniel Shafaf wrote: > > > Matt Mullins wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:06:48 -0800: > >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Philip M. Gollucci > >> wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> $ jls -nq | tail -1 | x

ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

[current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] Hi, in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking and i decided to run a few benchmarks. I looked through all the stuff Kris and

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

On 28. Jan 2012, at 08:19 , Daniel Shafaf wrote: > Matt Mullins wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:06:48 -0800: >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Philip M. Gollucci >> wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> $ jls -nq | tail -1 | xargs -n1 | egrep '^(name|jid)='| xargs >>> jid=17 name=17 >>> >>> # jubilee/ch

Re: svn commit: r227333 - in head: . sys/amd64/conf sys/arm/conf sys/conf sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/kern sys/mips/conf sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf

2011/11/8 Attilio Rao : > 2011/11/8 Attilio Rao : >> Author: attilio >> Date: Tue Nov  8 10:18:07 2011 >> New Revision: 227333 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227333 >> >> Log: >>  Introduce the option VFS_ALLOW_NONMPSAFE and turn it on by default on >>  all the architectures. >>  The

Re: [panic] intr_event_execute_handlers() - Corrupted DWARF expression

2012/1/19 John Baldwin : > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:02:57 am Glen Barber wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:50:45AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:01:37 pm Glen Barber wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I'm running -CURRENT from about 5 days ago: >> > > >> >

Re: jid and jname are numberic by default why? Can we change it ?

Matt Mullins wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:06:48 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Philip M. Gollucci > wrote: > > All, > > > > $ jls -nq | tail -1 | xargs -n1 | egrep '^(name|jid)='| xargs > > jid=17 name=17 > > > > # jubilee/chef > > jail_jubilee_hostname="jubilee.dca1.rws" > > jail_

Re: Is UPS_PORT_POWER wrong?

On Saturday 28 January 2012 12:53:39 Kohji Okuno wrote: > Hi HPS, > > Do you have better idea? > It might be we should implement a separate control request to get the information we need? Though that needs to be standardized. What do you think about that? --HPS ___

Re: Is UPS_PORT_POWER wrong?

Hi HPS, Do you have better idea? From: Kohji Okuno Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:53:29 +0900 (JST) > Hi HPS, > >> On Monday 23 January 2012 09:12:46 Kohji Okuno wrote: >>> Hi HPS, >>> >>> I think that UPS_PORT_POWER and UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE overlap. >>> And, in xhci.c you set UPS_PORT_POWER as fol

Re: [RFT] Major snd_hda rewrite

On 28.01.2012 13:39, Mickaël Maillot wrote: 2012/1/28 Alexander Motin mailto:m...@freebsd.org>> You are right. Fixed: http://svn.freebsd.org/__changeset/base/230641 And i can play DTS-HDMA en Dolby TrueHD ! thanks for all your work :) Hoor

Re: [RFT] Major snd_hda rewrite

2012/1/28 Alexander Motin > > You are right. Fixed: > http://svn.freebsd.org/**changeset/base/230641 > > Thank you! > > -- > Alexander Motin > And i can play DTS-HDMA en Dolby TrueHD ! thanks for all your work :) ___

Re: locks under printf(9) and WITNESS

BTW, I see another LOR with spinlocks, maybe harmless. o sysbeep() is called from syscons code and it calls timeout() which introduces the following order: scrlock -> callout. o The callout code programming of event timers introduces the following order (via callout_new_inserted == cpu_new_callo

Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

on 28/01/2012 11:37 Doug Barton said the following: > On 01/28/2012 01:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 28/01/2012 11:13 Doug Barton said the following: >>> On 01/27/2012 10:21, John Baldwin wrote: Does it operate fully with NEW_PCIB disabled entirely, or do you get this same message in that

Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

On 01/28/2012 01:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/01/2012 11:13 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 01/27/2012 10:21, John Baldwin wrote: >>> Does it operate fully with NEW_PCIB disabled entirely, or do you get this >>> same message in that case? >> >> I put nooptions NEW_PCIB in my kernel config,

Re: [RFT] Major snd_hda rewrite

On 28.01.2012 04:58, Mickaël Maillot wrote: 2012/1/25 Alexander Motin mailto:m...@freebsd.org>> Commenting it appeared not good, as at least mplayer doesn't sets channels for AC3. That makes sound(4) use default 1 channel for AC3, that is definitely not supported. I believe this sho

Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

on 28/01/2012 11:13 Doug Barton said the following: > On 01/27/2012 10:21, John Baldwin wrote: >> Does it operate fully with NEW_PCIB disabled entirely, or do you get this >> same message in that case? > > I put nooptions NEW_PCIB in my kernel config, and got basically the same: > > isab0: found

Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

On 01/27/2012 10:21, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:37:55 am Doug Barton wrote: >> On 01/03/2012 14:14, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:55:17 am Doug Barton wrote: On 08/02/2011 15:06, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:49:52